overpronator wrote: » Thanks lads, I always appreciate input here and really value the opinions of others on my own running. I'm always a bit cautious and probably guilty of over analysing what goes wrong rather than taking confidence from what goes well. A 1.23.07 half spits out a 2.54 or something on the calculators, that was more or less my PB HM pace just 6 months ago so I think that's where my caution stems from I know that it's still very much borderline but I absolutely wouldn't be going for it if I didn't think I could do it. Another thing is the almost obligatory Boards Glorious first sub 3 attempt fail, Ive read most of them and they all sound painful:) On the speed thing it was more of an observation about where I feel like I need to improve rather than something which would put me off a sub 3 attempt. What McMillan gives me for 10k and 5k (37.17 and 17.57) is eye meltingly fast for me at the moment, I reckon I wouldn't get inside a minute of either right now but I know I haven't trained specifically for them, hoping to address that though. Maybe I need to channel more of the Conor Mcgregor attitude:pac::pac:
overpronator wrote: » On the speed thing it was more of an observation about where I feel like I need to improve rather than something which would put me off a sub 3 attempt. What McMillan gives me for 10k and 5k (37.17 and 17.57) is eye meltingly fast for me at the moment, I reckon I wouldn't get inside a minute of either right now but I know I haven't trained specifically for them, hoping to address that though. Maybe I need to channel more of the Conor Mcgregor attitude:pac::pac:
menoscemo wrote: » Jesus, I have seen some sandbagging around these logs before but the bolded definitely takes the biscuit :pac: Let's assume you are correct and that your HM time (set in tough conditions I may add, at least that's what TRR and me are telling ourselves ) is out of whack with your 5-10k times. Well this would indicate a tendency towards improving as the distance increases. So given that, why do you feel you will fall apart (mcmillan-wise) in moving up to Marathon? As you know yourself London is much easier than Bohermeen, so that 6 minute McMillan buffer is loads. I am not saying anything is in the bag but you should at least be approaching London very confidently.
overpronator wrote: » 37.34 official time today at the K Club 10k. I ran this harder than originally planned but felt very strong throughout so a great last blowout before London.
NetwerkErrer wrote: » That's a cracking result OP! Got to give you loads of confidence heading into London. Some improvement over the last few months, fair play!:)
adrian522 wrote: » Great run, best of luck in London!
overpronator wrote: » Cheers Adrian well done to you too, the timing mat robbed 7 secs on me as wellcompared to the watch!
menoscemo wrote: » Where did yee get the results lads? can't connect to the BHAA website... OP I suspect we weren't 7 seconds crossing the line. What did the clock say as you went under it?
career move wrote: » Wow that's a fantastic time! Sorry I didn't get to meet you. I saw you talking to Meno but it was only after that I realised who you were
ThebitterLemon wrote: » Fab run, dead envious! Super confidence booster in advance of London. You should easily hit your target if you don't lose the head! Well done TbL
Duanington wrote: » Well done OP, you're motoring these days and in great shape for the big one