durtybit wrote: » Answer is in the first post
AudreyHepburn wrote: » Nitpicking much? Sorry my choice of words offends you so much :rolleyes:
Birneybau wrote: » Going forward? What's wrong with 'in the future'? Jesus...
Wacker The Attacker wrote: » Was he charged with drink driving?
durtybit wrote: » That's a very open ended question, I would rather follow the story and find out the truth.
Wacker The Attacker wrote: » Here's the real question. What did you think was going to happen?
skibum wrote: » http://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/monaghan-crash-off-duty-garda-arrested-5383903#rlabs=1 According to this article he was arrested at the scene, don't think he would have got far with three wheels on his car..... Can't see any evidence of fire crews cutting the patrol car open, they will usually remove the doors and roof, which are still on the car in the picture.
thebullkf wrote: » So Garda left scene of an accident , that he caused, drunk . And was later released ???
AudreyHepburn wrote: » He's not been charged at the moment but that doesn't he won't be be going forward. As the article states the GSOC has yet to investigate the incident.
AudreyHepburn wrote: » No it doesn't. If it was an ordinary punter people would be happy to accept his innocence. Because this man is a Garda people automatically assume that a) he's guilty until proven innocent and b) he'll get off scott free simply by virtue of being a Garda.
durtybit wrote: » The off-duty garda was arrested for drink-driving at around 11.20pm on Saturday night, when a garda car was struck by another vehicle on the hard shoulder of the N2 in Co Monaghan. Fire crews had to use specialist equipment to cut one of the officers from the smashed patrol car, before transferring him, along with his fellow officer and the driver of the broken down car, to hospital. The driver of the third car drove away, but gardaí from Monaghan town later arrested him and found that he was an off-duty garda. (Some one is in trouble... or not )
durtybit wrote: » That conclusion stands for any case, Garda or not
AudreyHepburn wrote: » Easier just to jump to conclusions because he's Garda though isn't it?
durtybit wrote: » Surely if there was evidence they would have not let him go without charge? Or am I wrong in thinking that?
Winty wrote: » This is Sunday's News, have you anything new?