anncoates wrote: » A secret message smuggled to the surface from the Internet outrage mines. Many toilers died to make sure it arrived in one piece.
darkpagandeath wrote: » Nah your mistaking me with the wrong kind of outrage, I'm sick of 2 yearolds running around on the roads, Around housing estates as if they own the place. And the smug parents saying it's their right to do so as roads are playgrounds.
suicide_circus wrote: Do you have many unidentified men in white vans driving around the area?
c_man wrote: » I visited a cousin at the weekend. He's around the same age as me, though now has a missus, kids and house in the country (literally a minute down the road from his parents, and a minute further from my Granny's). He was saying how much better it is for kids in the countryside compared with the citylife (referring to me growing up in Galway :pac: ). !
c_man wrote: » I visited a cousin at the weekend. He's around the same age as me, though now has a missus, kids and house in the country (literally a minute down the road from his parents, and a minute further from my Granny's). He was saying how much better it is for kids in the countryside compared with the citylife (referring to me growing up in Galway :pac: ). I couldn't disagree more, seeing the kids essentially cooped up in the bounds of the fence around the house and garden. Small road with cars regularly bombing down it just outside the gates. I grew up in an estate and was regularly 'out' unsupervised during the day with all the neighbourhood kids from a young age. We had a big enough green area in front of our street, lots of estates and other kids around and playgrounds within cycling distance (Christ we cycled everywhere!). I hate to hear of these kids being driven from/to everywhere, never out of sight, playing endlessly on a console or just indoors. Let your kids out for gods sake!
RonanP77 wrote: » Our kid is three and a half, we live in the ass hole of nowhere with a big garden, a big gate and a hedge the whole way around the outside. I was thinking of letting them play outside alone this summer, just keeping watch out the window a pop out every now and again. Do the good people of AH think three and a half is a little young or should it be OK? There are probably forums for questions about kids but they'll be packed with so called experts that want us to wrap kids in cotton wool until they're 21.
darkpagandeath wrote: » Eh, When did it become OK to leave children unsupervised at any age ? especially below 6.
Egginacup wrote: As long as there's no water like a stream or pond or a bog then I'd say let him loose. Worst things that will happen will be cuts, scratches and insect bites...which he's going to get all his life anyway.
suicide_circus wrote: » Do you have many unidentified men in white vans driving around the area?
Robsweezie wrote: » They would have to be street wise, have their wits about them and know all about stranger danger etc. I would say 8 or 9. But then again a younger age might toughen them up. (Sorry you mean a garden and not an estate, just keep an eager eye and ear on them)
RonanP77 wrote: » There's a bog down the bottom of the back garden and a drain/stream between us and it. The garden is separated from the lawns with a 4' beech hedge backed up by a chain link fence and a gate of the same height that's covered in angled trellace that little people can't climb over. I don't mind the cuts and bruises, we all get those anyway. I don't have fond memories of stings and bites but they didn't really do me any serious harm.
Egginacup wrote: » As for the bog.....take him down there and let him get stuck and then rescue him from the mire, thus demonstrating "bogs are dodgy, steer clear!"
RonanP77 wrote: » a hedge the whole way around the outside
RonanP77 wrote: » Tall for their age, fairly hardy and loves being outdoors.
the_syco wrote: /edit is the chain-link fence behind it all the way around?
the_syco wrote: A hedge ain't "secure".
Dravokivich wrote: » It'd be keen on taking a similar approach to a fare few things with my young fella. They'd learn more about caution from distress. Warning'em in advance means little. Sure I learned how to use the brakes on my bike after cycling straight into a thorn bush!
diomed wrote: What do you mean by "outside"? If you mean in your own garden then as soon as they are able to eat mud. If "outside" means in the street then age 7 and up, or younger if there are older children with them.
syklops wrote: This thread explains an awful lot about the young folk of today.
RonanP77 wrote: » The people saying to keep them locked up and protected?