ThebitterLemon wrote: » Just googled Ed Whitlock, ya cheeky young fecker, I'll take his times but not his wrinkles:) TbL
overpronator wrote: » Time to get updating again. The week after Bohermeen was a buffer week for me, I just did a few easy runs midweek to recover from the half and the weekend was a boozefest at a stag. I'm really not able for consecutive days on the lash anymore, tough going! Back into it this week thankfully.Monday 10.3 miles 7.22 pace A steady paced 10 on Monday morning and the legs felt good with the rest, body was a bit more tired and I was sweating buckets. A good one to blow off the cobwebs.Tuesday 5-4-3-2-1 @ "MP" off 2 minute recovery Ive stuck fairly rigidly to P&D not adding in sessions but with only one MP run left on the schedule before London I felt I needed to get in at least one more quality MP effort on top of that. Having thought about it for a while I went with Tergats 5-4-3-2-1 as I reckon id find it tough to stop and restart MP again when tired so a good extra stimulus. If I could sum up how I went about this run it would be absolute muppetry! Pacing was far too fast from the start and I did the session on empty with no water either:rolleyes: Anyway splits from the garmin were 5 mile (6.36 pace) 4 mile (6.36 pace) 3 mile (6.40 pace) 2 mile (6.40 pace) 1 mile (6.35 pace) The pace overall was stupid, I should have ran these around 6.45 or slower from the off but I ended up getting into a rhythm and holding on. I was tiring by the end of the 3 mile rep and really working far far too hard over the 2 mile rep, where a welcome 15s or so traffic light stop in Chapelizod saved me. The last mile was torture and I even had to stop on the Liffey towpath for a stretch as I had thought my calf was going. I finished it very very tired but I only have myself to blame. Its a good lesson for the day because even though the first rep felt comfortable there were just too many more miles to run and I paid for it. It's the toughest session I've done in all honesty but if had I paced it at 6.45-6.49 it would definitely been more manageable. 17M+ for the sessionWednesday 5.3m 8.08 pace Little bit of soreness and plenty of heaviness after the previous days lampooning. Tired.
ThebitterLemon wrote: » OP, that's a great MP session, I'd say if your aim is sub 3 you'd need to be running 6.45 Garmin mile splits and you weren't to far off that. Nice session to have in the bank TbL
overpronator wrote: » Thanks Sean, it's only one injury from coming crashing down though, London seems a long way away still. Might see you at the K club 10k?
outforarun wrote: » Catching-up here. Very impressive 1:23:07. You are really motoring, that's over 5 minutes improvement since last September right? I'll only be slowing you down when we meet up for our next run. The 55-70 schedule is clearly working for you (touching wood). I must have another look at that schedule. The base building late last year is also standing to you I'm sure. I'd say you're chomping at the bit ahead of London now. So will you have a shot at it, or will you wait for the next cycle?
menoscemo wrote: » Are you in the GFA pen OP?
overpronator wrote: » Nah Meno, red start. Yourself?
menoscemo wrote: » Red start also but right at the front from the GFA pen. I guess if you start right up the front, we won't be far off at the startline. Make sure to give me a shout as you whizz by
overpronator wrote: » Would people suggest repeating that 14 mile session this week instead or just chalk it down and keep following the plan?
Bulmers74 wrote: » For me I'd continue on with the plan & not revisit the session. Conditions were severe & you had to adapt.
outforarun wrote: » I'd agree, just chalk it down. You're right at the edge at the moment and I reckon that taper can't come soon enough. Repeating 14 miles MP would contradict the correct reward/risk decision you made on Sunday. Rarely will anyone expect to get through a cycle without 'failing' on a session or three and it's not like you skipped the session, you didn't 'fail' on effort. Weekend after next sounds good for a run, I've my second 20 miler on the Sunday of that weekend so the company would be welcome.
bigslice wrote: » Well OP, great log and I enjoy reading it, I started at a similar time to you and would have had similar times along the way. I'm not doing a spring marathon but am currently building up a base for Berlin in the Autumn. At the minute I'm looking at plans and the P&D that you followed is what I'm leaning to. I followed the 12 week 55mile plan for Dublin 2013 and went from 3.42 (2012) to 3.21, so I kinda trust the plans they have. How have you found the plan and you happy with it? Super times to date and best of luck for London.
overpronator wrote: » Thanks Bigslice, do you log anywhere yourself? P&D was exactly what I needed as the increase in mileage over a consistent period has given as much of a training effect as the sessions I think. Id recommend it for the likes of ourselves at 3.15-3.30 and looking to push on ultimately to sub 3 territory. I didn't fancy upping mileage on a Daniels plan and adding in another session a week, I felt I would have buckled under that load. Im very happy with the plan as its given me a shout at sub 3 which I wasn't expecting for London. I know I'm very much on the edge for sub 3 and it could well be a marathon cycle too early for me as I still think I lack a bit of the required speed over the shorter stuff. Hopefully I can address that with some focussed work over the summer and finally joining a club. Id say get a good base into your legs (60+MPW for a few weeks if you can) and maybe sharpen up with some 10k training for 6-8 weeks and jump into the 12 week plan.
menoscemo wrote: » +1 to what TbL said. I really don't get the comment about you not being fast enough at the shorter distances for a 3 hr marathon. You are definitely fast enough given recent results. If speed is the problem then I can think of two old codgers who are definitely fooked