L1011 wrote: » Option 1 would also require the same anti-social behaviour enforcement if they want pedestrians to use the boardwalk in preference - also, as the boardwalk is closed off with flood gates during exceptional tides this really can't be a runner.
lxflyer wrote: » If the boardwalk had to be closed off (and how often does this happen?) then surely pedestrians can simply walk along the north side of the Quays as they do now - hardly a reason to dismiss the proposal surely? It's not that hard to cross over the road.
L1011 wrote: » If the existing building-side footpath is deemed sufficient why are they proposing to extend the boardwalk to compensate for losing the river-side footpath?
hmmm wrote: » It'll only take a few cars to not pay any attention to the yellow box on Church Street, and we'll end up with 40 buses queuing to try and get onto Church street. If your public transport system is dependent on compliance at a yellow box junction, it won't work. How many buses will be able to get onto Church street at a time? The present bus lane can be nose to tail of buses. The turning circle is a concern too as mentioned. One bus gets stuck and the whole line stops.
lxflyer wrote: » Do you make plans on the basis of extremely rare events or the normal prevailing conditions?
L1011 wrote: » Without a severe crackdown on anti-social behaviour and then frequent policing afterwards, I'd not be happy to cycle along the edge of an extended Croppies Acre, unless its fenced in which case I'd not be too happy to cycle along what would be a tiny slice between a fence and the river... Catch 22 there.
hmmm wrote: » It'll only take a few cars to not pay any attention to the yellow box on Church Street, and we'll end up with 40 buses queuing to try and get onto Church street. If your public transport system is dependent on compliance at a yellow box junction, it won't work.
AngryLips wrote: » Seriously?
L1011 wrote: » In my industry, if I don't make plans for the rare events I lose my job.
bk wrote: » It can certainly be done well with the correct design.
hmmm wrote: » I imagine it would work in Munich, but I've no confidence in anything in this country that depends on compliance from road users. This is what a bus will be faced withhttps://goo.gl/maps/kw3zO
bk wrote: » That is why we need automatic cameras and fines, because what Irish people do respect is lost money out of their pocket and potentially losing their driving license.
hmmm wrote: » I pass the Bus Gate every morning, and despite an almost permanent police presence these days there are still people driving through it and getting fined - many if not most are tourists and people who are simply lost. You'll have people driving into that yellow box by accident or because of lack of attention, even with fines being handed out.
desertcircus wrote: » All cyclists on this route will need to join the route and turn off it. In both cases, a cycle lane on the river side is the inferior option; it's awkward to reach, and turning off will require crossing back across traffic in every case.
monument wrote: » Red light camera already in place at nearby junction, once can be put in place at Church St. Transport and tourism benefits outweigh a very small, if any peak time delay to buses.
lxflyer wrote: » I'm not sure that the over 6,500 plus Dublin Bus peak hour commuters (that's in one hour) on that corridor whose journey times are going to be extended would in any way agree with that view.
lxflyer wrote: » Adding to peak hour journey times on a key public transport corridor is something we should be striving to avoid.
monument wrote: » Should what may only amount to seconds of a delay come before extra added route capacity, high tourism benefits, health benefits, safety benefits, and sustainably benefits? Indeed, but it can't be ruled out.
lxflyer wrote: » Look I appreciate that you have a particular interest from the cycling perspective, but please stop trying to belittle the impact on public transport. At peak times this is not going to add "only seconds" to bus journeys and trying to suggest otherwise is just not realistic. At least 95 Dublin Bus vehicles in one hour plus everything else thrown in are going to experience longer journeys. This is the principal public transport corridor for most of west Dublin and funnelling every bus/coach from that direction down a road that will lead to two T Junctions is not a viable prospect. I'm absolutely in favour of developing improved cycling facilities in this city, but they should be in tandem with improved public transport - not at it's expense. That's a nonsense.