zetecescort wrote: » Football played before the hurling today, pitch not up to standard for intercounty hurling
Cu Baire wrote: » Delighted for the Cork football players and management who have been abused and disrespected by so many keyboard "experts". In the toughest division 1 for years and a difficult draw they are deservedly top of the table with only 2 rounds to go. It shows the calibre of some people posting on here that there is so little comment on yesterdays game but we would have pages of nonsense if they had lost.
commonsense. wrote: » And so Rochestown's epic adventure finally came to an end on Saturday last. Hardly unexpected given the exertions of the last 3 weeks. As you'd expect from this group they went down fighting. Took the game to Kierans and had they taken two goal chances would have been ahead at half time. They finally seemed to run out of steam on the home straight and let Kierans in for a softish goal with 6 minutes to go which finally killed them off. Everybody associated with this group deserve huge congratulations. They will have great memories in years to come of two epic campaigns. However being so close to both Munster hurling and football crowns and ending up with nothing begs the obvious question. Would they be better focusing on one code?
Deco99 wrote: Actually, i may be open to correction on the Donegal game, i think they played against the wind first half anyway/
Redsoxfan wrote: » No, ye had the wind in the first half.
ShamoBuc wrote: A great run and a great experience for them. At that age playing both codes shouldn't be an issue. They are a credit to their school and management !
commonsense. wrote: » Well if you believe 6 days was sufficient time to prepare for Kierans College in an AI quarter final, then playing both codes isn't an issue!!!!
ShamoBuc wrote: It was unfortunate that maybe they didn't have longer but to think of dropping one sport in case they go all the way in both is just ridiculous in the extreme! How often is it going to happen that a school has the opportunities afforded to them like this year? Its the price you pay for success! They came very close to doing the double - it will be a long while before another team comes that close again.
ShamoBuc wrote: I suppose they had the 'misfortune' to be good enough to do both
commonsense. wrote: » What success??? They lost both Munster finals. And yes, while they came very close to doing the double that is ultimately what cost them in my view. I'm a hurling man first but would think that if they were focussing on one or other code their chances of success would improve hugely. And I don't think it will be that long before another team come that close again as a big number of this Rochestown group are eligible again next year. If the school decide to give equal focus to both they will be there or thereabouts in both. But in huge danger of coming up short again. I wonder how the players who lost two Munster finals this year would feel if they lost two more next year. It's too great a risk. Focus on one or risk being remembered for all the wrong reasons.
ShamoBuc wrote: Success in measured in many ways, not just trophies. Concentrating on one code is putting all their eggs in one basket, what about the players that only play one code, tough?? Would going with one code have made a difference? Who knows!! Maybe the bond of playing and winning both codes got them to the finals in the first place.
ShamoBuc wrote: » Success in measured in many ways, not just trophies. Concentrating on one code is putting all their eggs in one basket, what about the players that only play one code, tough?? Would going with one code have made a difference? Who knows!! Maybe the bond of playing and winning both codes got them to the finals in the first place. 'It's too great a risk to lose 2 finals again next year 'can be argued another way. You gotta lose 2 to win 2 !! I wonder how the players who lost 2 finals this year would feel in winning 2 finals next year???? Crystal balls would help of course !!
commonsense. wrote: » Yeah, was waiting for the "success is measured in many ways" argument to be rolled out. Tell that to the Roco players after the last 3 weeks.
ShamoBuc wrote: » You are clearly only interested in hurling and feel football was only a hindrance to them. I disagree. My old Alma Mater did the double ! Some of the teachers that taught me were on those teams. They will never forget those matches or the bond the team had, born out of both codes !! The lads came very close, losses in either final were not as a result of going so far in both. In truth, the drawn football final was the bridge too far, but either way ask those players which run in the competitions would they give up for ' the possible slenderest of differences - if any ' in winning the other??
ShamoBuc wrote: You are clearly only interested in hurling and feel football was only a hindrance to them. I disagree. My old Alma Mater did the double ! Some of the teachers that taught me were on those teams. They will never forget those matches or the bond the team had, born out of both codes !! The lads came very close, losses in either final were not as a result of going so far in both. In truth, the drawn football final was the bridge too far, but either way ask those players which run in the competitions would they give up for ' the possible slenderest of differences - if any ' in winning the other??