Egginacup wrote: » Do we have a source for Putin stating that he would use nuclear warfare to annex The Crimea?
Egginacup wrote: » Anyway, When can we expect any kind of developments regarding MH-17? It's been 8...9 months now and still there are no updates...not even redress regarding the initial ironclad accusations that the Russians were responsible. In fact the initial Director of National Intelligence assessment has not even been updated or addresses since July 22, 2014, despite the fact that not only US intelligence has contradicted and in fact refuted any existence of Russian involvement as have the German BND security service. SO....it's nearly 9 months now since the plane was shot down and the DNI have not updated a single part of their assessment. Leaving all this aside.....when can we expect Crimea to allow McDonalds back in?
feargale wrote: » Putin and Berlusconi are best pals. That pretty well says it all.
Egginacup wrote: » Might you supply a link to the aforementioned article rather then just allude thereto? Would that be possible?
Gatling wrote: » July you'll have to scrape the egg off It's a 12 month investigation . We all know the truth already
Egginacup wrote: » The initial assessment hasn't been even updated since last July, despite multiple sources of contradiction from not only within the United States Intelligence Services but also from those within the European Intelligence services who have delivered updated information long after July 2014....yet the DNI assessment has not changed from 5 days after the MH-17 airliner was downed and it was determined, ipso facto, that Russia was and were the perpetrators. Now, there are some who think that 12 months will somehow show something that could have been shown in 12 minutes were the allegations as truthful as everyone claimed. The fact remains, that the accusations of Russians shooting down this airliner are becoming more and more fantastic. Not only that but all the arguments and games are becoming flimsy.
Originally Posted by Coup detat I was reading today that Putin said in his documentary that he was ready to use nuclear weapons if needed when he annexed Crimea. . Let's have that which you were reading then.
Originally Posted by Coup detat I was reading today that Putin said in his documentary that he was ready to use nuclear weapons if needed when he annexed Crimea.
Originally Posted by Coup detat There was an article in the Irish times, on BBC news as well. Might you supply a link to the aforementioned article rather then just allude thereto? Would that be possible?
Might you supply a link to the aforementioned article rather then just allude thereto? Would that be possible?
obplayer wrote: » It has been pointed out that it is a 12 month investigation.http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=94715771&postcount=1117 I have given replies to two of your posts. Replyhttp://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=94716990&postcount=1119 Replyhttp://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=94717122&postcount=1124 Any comments?
obplayer wrote: » Sources and links?
Egginacup wrote: » Well, absent for nearly a year, the proof that the Russians shot down the airliner, proof that John Kerry has stated categorically that he has but can't provide, and yet the Germans can't determine either:https://consortiumnews.com/2014/10/20/germans-clear-russia-in-mh-17-case/ ..whether or not there is any evidence. Now, I'm only quoting professional ex-intelligence personnel here, so don't use it as my quote:https://consortiumnews.com/2014/07/29/obama-should-release-ukraine-evidence/ But will we ever see real evidence of BUK systems that were supposed to have brought down MH-17?
obplayer wrote: » http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-31899680
Un Croissant wrote: » What will Egg talk about if it turns out Russia was involved?
Egginacup wrote: » You do, do you? It's funny that the assessment hasn't been updated since 5 days after the plane was downed. Why is that? 8 months and no change. Nothing about US or German intelligence refuting proof that it was shot down by Russians or separatists using BUK battery. Some investigation.
Un Croissant wrote: » It's good that we are talking about the airliner now. Almost as if we are ignoring what Putin said about Crimea. What will Egg talk about if it turns out Russia was involved?
dubscottie wrote: » Don't expect one from Commieinacup.. If its not on RT its all lies..
Egginacup wrote: » Hardly, since I own two companies.
Egginacup wrote: » "Commie" ? Hardly, since I own two companies. Didn't communism cease to exist in Russia in the early 90's? Not very bright of you, that quip, was it?
19 March 2015 Ukraine conflict: Inside Russia's 'Kremlin troll army' By Olga Bugorkova BBC Monitoring Over the past year, Russia has seen an unprecedented rise in the activity of "Kremlin trolls" - bloggers allegedly paid by the state to criticise Ukraine and the West on social media and post favourable comments about the leadership in Moscow. Though the existence and even whereabouts of the alleged "cyber army" are no secret, recent media reports appear to have revealed some details of how one of the tools of Russian propaganda operates on an everyday basis. "Troll den" The Internet Research Agency ("Agentstvo Internet Issledovaniya") employs at least 400 people and occupies an unremarkable office in one of the residential areas in St Petersburg.
cnocbui wrote: » There is next to no doubt the findings will confirm it was a BUK:http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCAKBN0MF1ZW20150319 They found a fragment of the BUK complete with A Cyrillic letter and part of a serial number and Janes, amongst others, say it matches a BUK explosive charge. Fragment shown here: http://www.rtlnieuws.nl/nieuws/binnenland/bewijs-voor-neerhalen-mh17-door-buk-raket
Fallschirmjager wrote: » Honestly won't matter, Russia will just say its some vast conspiracy by the cia and people who want to believe a dictatorship will accept it. Prediction Buk shrapnel placed while in Dutch/us/western hands Or part of another plane shot down with a buk and added by cia/Mossad/joooos Or our samples taken to Russia show it was air to air missile or magic bullets But not Russia And off they will go, it will become like the JFK 'mystery' to the believers...you have seen it already because of the investigation that could lead to war, silence means the cia is covering up.
Elmer Blooker wrote: » How did the Dutch "reporter" know what he was picking up off the ground at the crash site which no doubt was strewn with wreckage. "Oh look, that looks like a fragment from a BUK missile supplied by Putin himself" Conclusive damning evidence!!http://static3.uk.businessinsider.com/image/550b0663dd0895ff7a8b4591-1200-706/screen%20shot%202015-03-19%20at%201.11.07%20pm.png Apparently the Dutch now dismissing reports, watch how this "story" will be buried and disappear without trace ..... until the next yarn of course!http://usa24.ws/latest/dutch-dismiss-reports-alleging-mh17-downed-by-buk-missile
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/eaabbaf8a16773590ee22dd6c15f1d68.svg)
