nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

3 women tortue man for cheating on them (Mod note post one)

NachoBusiness

Three women lured a man to a flat after they found out that he had been dating them all at the same time. They forced him to drink washing up liquid, punched, kicked and slapped him repeatedly, bit his ear, burned the back of his neck with a cigarette lighter and his genitals with a curling tongs. Yet, despite all this, all three were only given community service.

A guy was also involved in the beating, stole the victim's phone and was jailed for 12 months as a result but I am stunned that these women have all walked considering what they did. What kind of message does it send that women can strip a man, tie him to a chair, beat him, burn his genitals and only have to complete some communicate service for justice to have deemed to have been served.

Women tortured man by burning hair tongs and cigarette lighter on to his genitals like a scene from Reservoir Dogs

Three women tortured a man by pressing burning hair tongs and a cigarette lighter on to his genitals when they found he had dated three people at once, a court has heard.

The trio also taunted the victim with a pizza cutter in what was described as like a scene from Reservoir Dogs.

Lorraine Earles, 47, Natalie Lilley, 19, Leah White, 22, along with male defendant Brendan Teale, 27, had plotted revenge on the victim for allegedly seeing several women at a time and lured him to a flat in Scarborough before strapping him to a chair.

The three women and one man then carried out a prolonged attack on the victim, who was also forced to drink liquid wash before having the hot curling tongs pressed to his genitals.

York Crown Court heard one of his tormentors also burnt him with a cigarette lighter as the others laughed and giggled.

During the torture he also had a pizza cutter pressed to his cheek and was punched, kicked and slapped repeatedly.

The court heard Earles bit the man's ear, pushed his head down to his knees and used a cigarette lighter to burn the back of his neck, before threatening to suffocate him as she put a scarf around his mouth.

She then ordered White to burn his genitals with hair curling tongs before pulling the chair back, causing him to fall backwards onto the floor.

Read more here.

No doubt, had this been a women that was treated like this by a group of men, I couldn't see any of them not serving time. Absolute nonsense of a sentence.

mod note: knock it off with the generalization of feminists

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

[Deleted User]

eternal wrote: »

What did they say?

Nought. Just links to the thread.

Jhcx

Anything to be said for another mass.

All well getting the beatings but leave a man's privates alone

eternal

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Nought. Just links to the thread.

Strange like they thought you'd like it.

Heckler

If 3 men did this to a woman they'd be locked up for a very long time and rightly so.

If 3 men did this to a woman and got the sentences these woman did there would be a Facebook campaign and general social media generated outrage.

[Deleted User]

eternal wrote: »

Strange like they thought you'd like it.

Something like that.

As for the thread. Drop all references to the sex of the perpetrators... or the victim........ and then tell me were the perpetrators sentenced in proportional relation to the crime they committed.

Seems to me there is nothing more worth discussing than that, oder?

Littlekittylou

FloatingVoter wrote: »

FairPlay.com

.....I'll split the domain name with you 50/50.

Our "talent" will supply itself free.

Fair Play.

suicide_circus

Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime wrote: »

Me arse !

Impose equal rights here, if 3 blokes tied up a woman like that they would all be in jail for a very long time.

Just because its 3 woman doing this to one guy it shouldn't be any different.

The problem is that in the eyes of the law, women are invariably victims, any feminist would be appalled at this sentencing

tritium

suicide_circus wrote: »

The problem is that in the eyes of the law, women are invariably victims, any feminist would be appalled at this sentencing

While many women and men who classify themselves as feminists would be rightly appalled I think its safe to say that there's a significant cadre of advocates who would not only applaud the sentences but who are actively working to portray women who commit crimes as the invariable victims of society, with no agency of their own. I'm thinking for example of Ivana Bacik, who actively advocated a different and less severe treatment of women criminals, or the WAR group, who think its inappropriate to prosecute a woman for perverting the course of justice.

Panthro

I don't give a fidders fock what gender, race, creed you are. If go are involved in something like this you deserve to be fuct into jail and locked up for a good stretch.

Insane to the think they got away with it

expatinator

Horrible, horrible event.

But, damn, I wouldn't mind writing that scene. It's so crazy that you can't help but be curious at what's going on in their head.

PizzamanIRL

My porn search history was just posted as a thread title.

Colser

PizzamanIRL wrote: »

My porn search history was just posted as a thread title.

Be careful what you wish for....:D

DeadHand

PizzamanIRL wrote: »

My porn search history was just posted as a thread title.

"Fidelma Healy Eames at it again"?

SeanW

lee_baby_simms wrote: »

Well you know what they say, if you poke the fire long enough you're bound to get burnt.

Not exactly sympathetic to the victim? He had it coming? Would you say the same about a woman in the same circumstances?

Panthro wrote: »

I don't give a fidders fock what gender, race, creed you are. If go are involved in something like this you deserve to be fuct into jail and locked up for a good stretch.

Insane to the think they got away with it

There's nothing insane about it, this sentence perfectly reflects societal values towards sexual and gender based violence. I saw a video on some experiment in the U.S. where a major network had actors pretend to be a man abusing his partner and then the reverse, guess which got the most attention from bystanders?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRCS6GGhIRc

Faith+1

3 men do something similar when they find the girl they were dating cheating on them. They flog her, cut her hair and burn her breasts with cigarettes. Would they get community service!? F*cking joke of a sentence.

Tarzana2

Horrific.

Hot curling tongs are really painful to touch off your fingers, can't imagine the pain of them in a more sensitive, nervy area.

It's completely indefensible that custodial sentences weren't handed down.

NachoBusiness

Found it strange how the man's age was never mentioned in any of the articles on this but from reading another article on it from last year, turns out the man was in fact just 18 years old at the time. Makes the lack of a custodial sentence all the more incredible.

What does it say about a society that would allow three grown women who subjected an 18 year old to a beating and sexual torture, walk free? Sure gives sentences like this one an interesting context.

RollieFingers

Sure lads equal rights and gender equality are only for women remember?

Joke of a sentence, those 3 cnuts should be doing time!

LDN_Irish

They should of course be serving jail sentences. If you actually read the article though there isn't really a gender disparity in the sentences given*. The man wouldn't have served a custodial either if he didn't have previous convictions for assault. He didn't actually receive 12 months inside for this incident, he received it for this incident which was plead down to ABH, a burglary he committed while on bail for this incident and for handling stolen goods.

Can't even really blame the courts entirely. The CPS should have never accepted plea downs to ABH for a false imprisonment and what must have passed the threshold for GBH. Assuming he serves half which is what will happen unless he commits further crimes while inside, he will have served 1 month more than the woman that the courts and CPS decided was the worst offender, as she served 5 months inside on remand.

*NB. This doesn't mean that if 3 men and a woman had dome the same to a woman they wouldn't have received bigger sentences, which I'm sure they would have.

D'Agger

Tarzana2 wrote: »

Horrific. Hot curling tongs are really painful to touch off your fingers, can't imagine the pain of them in a more sensitive, nervy area.

It's completely indefensible that custodial sentences weren't handed down.

Oh it's okay though - the tongs weren't on full heat :rolleyes:

[Deleted User]

Jesus christ that's sick
Lock them up
psychos

jbtarmac121

Being born with a vagina = you won at life

Galwayguy35

The amount of women on FB saying "well done he deserved it" is unreal.

I doubt they would like to have the box burned if they were caught cheating or see it as a fitting punishment.

Pumpkinseeds

Jesus, what an appalling lack of justice. They planned a vicious assault on a man and essentially got away with it. I hope the ruling is appealed and that a real sentence is imposed on those women.

jbtarmac121

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

The amount of women on FB saying "well done he deserved it" is unreal.

I doubt they would like to have the box burned if they were caught cheating or see it as a fitting punishment.

I'm seeing the lack of empathy myself from many women on this issue.

[Deleted User]

RollieFingers wrote: »

Sure lads equal rights and gender equality are only for women remember?

Joke of a sentence, those 3 cnuts should be doing time!

They certainly should, but it less to do with gender than judges and sentencing guidelines. Let's not pretend that stupid sentences aren't handed down for sexual offences against women by men too.

We've had suspended sentences or fines as sentences against rapists and child molesters -even those who plead guilding to abusing children for decades - in Ireland. I don't blame that on gender inequality, I blame that on the same issue - judges and sentencing guidelines.

jbtarmac121

Candie wrote: »

They certainly should, but it less to do with gender than judges and sentencing guidelines.

Wrong.

It does amaze me how people can dispute that men are treated more harshly than women in courts for the same crimes.

[Deleted User]

jbtarmac121 wrote: »

Wrong.

It does amaze me how people can dispute that men are treated more harshly than women in courts for the same crimes.

Read it again. I said it has LESS to do with gender, I didn't say it had nothing to do with it.

jbtarmac121

Candie wrote: »

Read it again. I said it has LESS to do with gender, I didn't say it had nothing to do with it.

It's ALL to do with it.

[Deleted User]

jbtarmac121 wrote: »

It's ALL to do with it.

If thats the case, then explain why do so many terrible crimes result in a suspended sentence or a fine? How is it okay to take into account a persons reception at their golf club as a mitigating factor? Yet it happens, but I won't say it only happens because the perpetrator was male, although undoubtedly that is part of it.

It's fine to acknowledge one injustice, but stupid to dismiss all other aspects of a failing judicial system.

Reducing everything to gender might be good for pushing an agenda, but for real change to occur you have to take off the blinkers. The system is broken, it needs fixing. Gender is one aspect but it's not the entire picture and insisting it is doesn't address the bigger picture.