EthanSS wrote: » Thanks for all the help last night guys. My next exam is Propery. Does anybody have notes on Land Registration? I have notes on Adverse P, Succession, Finding and Family Property. Also, what is everybody covering for Property?
FeDespair wrote: » So I didnt do equity in the end, was up all night but nothing went in so it would have been a waste of time. Oh well. Considering not doing EU either, I had planned to start it as soon as Constitution was over and spend the week learning but as I spent the weekend at equity that's gone out the window. Does anyone know where I could maybe get my hands on EU notes? Ive looked online and there are no revision books even so i'd literally have to ingest an entire book before Friday... Thanks for your help everyone, this is a great thread
jenspondolik wrote: » You should do it im in same boat, spent all my time on other subjects that went awful and left eu completely from scratch with no notes for this week. I did nothing Friday after const or saturday and did notes for 2.5 topics yesterday so dont sweat. i havent done EU in 4 years. Dont sweat it you could spend months and EU and still get screwed so dont sweat it we might get lucky. PMing you there re Mats.
maya_bb wrote: » I must be mad but I'm trying to tag the Blackhall eu book ahead of the exam, and was looking for the section on the institutions and couldn't see it at all!! My notes say A17 etc for the Commission - are these the old articles then? Can anyone point me to the right page/article please? Going mad. Aaah!
Arcturus2112 wrote: » That's Article 17. It's page 7 of my Blackstone (2011-2012 edition)
maya_bb wrote: » I'm working off the 2009-2010 edition and A17 of the treaty establishing the European community is on citizenship in my book. What treaty is it for the institutions? I know basic questions - I'm totally screwed!
jenspondolik wrote: » I also noted my manual speaks of directive 1612/68 and I couldn't find it for movement workers looks like its now 492/2011 had to google. Im still writing notes Lol! Hope to start learning weds and Thurs.
Arcturus2112 wrote: » News to me! Thanks for that. I just looked at 492/2011 and the only significant change that I see at a glance is that Article 12 of 1612/68 is now Article 10 of 492/2011 (Worker's families). This is relevant in the context of Citizenship rights (if you're covering that), rather than free movement of workers.
sunshine and showers wrote: » Right, I've had a gander at the case note questions. Here are the most popular ones going back to Spring 2008. Make of this what you will (and help me make something of it!!)Nine times Case T-201/04 Microsoft v Commission [2007] ECR II-3601Six times Case 26/62 Van Gend en Loos [1963] ECR1 Case C-224/01 Köbler [2003] ECR I-10239 Case T-342/99 Airtours v Commission [2002] ECR II-2585Five times Case 22/70 Commission v Council (“ERTA”) [1971] ECR 263 Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans and Regierunspräsidium Magdeburg [2003] ECR I- Joined Cases C-402/06 P and C-415/05 P Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council [2008] ECR I-6351 Case C236/09 Association belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL and Others v. Conseil des ministres (Judgment of 1 Mar 2011) Case C-34/09 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-nyr (Judgment of 8 March 2011)Four Times Case C-200/02 Zhu and Chen [2004] ECR I-9925 Case C-341/05 Laval un Partneri [2007] ECR I-11767 Case 106/11 Simmenthal [1978] ECR 629 Case C-91/92 Faccini Dori [1994] ECR I-3325 Case C-34/09 Pringle v Ireland [2012] ECR
EthanSS wrote: » Arcturus, I'm covering the EXACT same topics as you. I was hoping to do Land Registration as well but unsure if I'll bother. I really hate easements so was thinking Land Reg could be an easier question to answer were it to arise on the exam.
MissM89 wrote: » Could anyone shed any light on enforcement in competition law - I have just realised my city colleges EU manual is absolutely shocking and so out of date and the notes done mention anything about the National Competition Authority but Im pretty sure its relevant somehow!
Galw2014 wrote: » Would anyone like to share what they're covering for contract? Finding it difficult to cut anything out at the moment.
XxMCRxBabyxX wrote: » Just looking to clear something up in Property. Can a same sex couple be considered to be Qualified Cohabitants under the Civil Partnership Act? The City manual states that they must be "a person who has lived with a person of the opposite sex" but I can't seem to find anything that backs that up. I'm looking at Q1 in the March 2013 paper but I see that her report doesn't mention it.
