Kevin McCloud wrote: » Did the google not have anything to say about it.
kneemos wrote: » What's the science behind warp speed,or the makey up science at least?
Jawgap wrote: » Warp drive, in theory wouldn't 'propel' a ship forward it would warp space bringing the point of destination closer. Needs a lot of energy - a wormhole would be quicker!
wendell borton wrote: » Zefram Cochraine will invent the warp drive in 2063.
iDave wrote: » We've WW3 to live through first.
Iranoutofideas wrote: » Powered by Haggis farts.
Desolation Of Smug wrote: » Honda cracked this years ago -they called it Vtec.
Jawgap wrote: » Well I for one can't wait to get my hands on one those fancy communicators they had in Star Trek - imagine having a device you can carry around either you and anyone with a similar device will be able to contact you........
Tony EH wrote: » Yeh, but if Apple make it so it can beam you up to a spaceship (or even just to work in the morning) then I will seriously know we've hot the future. I'll still hate Apple though.
Jawgap wrote: » For warp speed, you need to start with a condom
Iwasfrozen wrote: » It's makey up science, as far as we know nothing can break the light speed barrier and nothing with a mass can ever reach light speed.
Iwasfrozen wrote: » Well I guess it comes down to how to generate negative energy and if enough can be generated to carry this out. How would this affect time dilation though?