Claregal11 wrote: » Does anyone know what the tort paper is marked like? Like for attempts at questions or if you did half right and stuck in a few wrong bits? Trying to work out if there's anyway I could have passed!
sunshine and showers wrote: » Arguably the Catholicism question was where interpretation fit in.
Troels Hartmann wrote: » I passed Tort last sitting despite coming out of it in a very depressed state. Hes definitely not the worst marker
lawbear wrote: » Hey…this gives me hope, I was so annoyed and disheartened coming out of Tort, has anyone past tort or any papers before answering four questions? Im clutching at straws here.
lawbear wrote: » What did people write for the Callelly case?? I was so stuck and dumb founded when I first read the paper I answered that by talking about the separation of powers, comity of organs of state and the courts reluctance to get involved with internal workings of the oireachtas?? I agreed that i think courts should be able to interfere with the privilege?? is this all wrong….I feel like I don't know what just happened in that paper.
Arcturus2112 wrote: » I haven't seen anyone mention Freedom of Expression for Q.4? As I read it, the key issues are primarily freedom of expression and right to livelihood, to be balanced as against the right to earn a livelihood and the right to good name of the other medical professionals. Also necessary to discuss proportionality. "Cheapest in town" may be permissible, while "the only one that has never been sued" may be permissibly prohibited. As for the blanket ban, Colgan v IRTC (blanket ban may be permissible etc). People have mentioned non-delegation and Article 15.2. I discussed this briefly. I think that issue would only arise if the Act did not contain policies as to the grounds on which the Board can approve advertisements and whether there is an Oireachtas "power to review" a la McGowan. I really don't see it as a central issue here though, as the Board only issued guidelines - these are not specified as being binding or non-binding, nor is there any mention of sanctions for non-compliance (a bit of reference to Fair Procedures and Article 37.1, limited decision-making powers that may have a far-reaching affect on person's livelihood, M v Medical Council etc).
lawbear wrote: » Does anyone have an upto date exam grid for equity? would really appreciate it.
Lolers11 wrote: » What about the question on 38.1? Did anyone do that one? I think it was q4? Whether she could challenge Judge on Pre trial publicity - I just spoke about this and article 34.1. It seemed too obvious! So I was worried when I was answering.
marky200ie wrote: » I did pre trial publicity too, and then took a stab at freedom of the press (mahon v post publication) and why it wouldn't pass the Heaney proportionality test as basis why the court wouldn't allow prohibition of media coverage during the trial...honestly didn't know what I was writing half the time :-/ Anyone know what sort of marker the examiner is for constitution?...clutching at straws here!
TinkledPink wrote: » So... what's the plan for equity? I'm leaving out Purpose/Charitable Trusts, Constructive Trusts & Injunctions (except Mareva). Hoping for Q's on: Mareva UI Express Trusts Resulting Trusts SP/Rect (hate this) or Estoppel Should have a bit ready on Trusteeship/Tracing too and hopefully enough to have a go at the note question if I'm stuck. What are you guys hoping for?
dashdoll wrote: » Im covering the following...should I be ok? Mareva Inj Recission Specific Performance Rectification Estoppel Donatia Mortis Causa Charitable Trusts Tracing Trusteeship
Arcturus2112 wrote: » Yeah, I reckon you should be ok with that. But like I said in a previous post, stick in Secret Trusts if you can manage them also.
FEar1 wrote: » Would I be right in saying that people are feeling constructive and charitable trusts are less hot topics than resulting, secret and express trusts? I'm covering Mareva and Interlocutory Injunctions Secret, Resulting and Express Trusts Specific Performance and Rectification Trusteeship Proprietary Estoppel Constitution of Trusts (Donatio Mortis Causa/Strong v Bird) I've short notes on Anton Piller Orders and Undue Influence too. Whats peoples thoughts in general? My first ever FE1, any general tips for surviving? haha
sunshine and showers wrote: » the guy beside me in Constitutional filled a booklet and had to get another one. I counted the pages, there are over 40 if you write on the front and back. What did he write?!?
dashdoll wrote: » I wouldnt worry....Maybe he was only writing on one side ;-)
dashdoll wrote: » I would have thought that Charitable Trusts are quite a hot topic eventhough it came up on the last paper because if the new Charities Act coming into force in Oct What do people think?
XxMCRxBabyxX wrote: » City has them tipped
