Egginacup wrote: » The fcuking idiot Bulgarians tried to put restrictions on the south stream pipeline after taking the EUs advice. If they had agreed to the deal they would have made a fortune in transit fees as well as discounted fuel. Putin pulled the plug and now the pipeline will pass through turkey instead and Bulgaria like the morons that they are will have to buy fuel at a 50% markup from alternative sources. But you wouldn't know a thing about that would you?
InTheTrees wrote: » Not one of whom has lasted more than 8 years. Because the US constitution is still intact. Hard to have a leader who's too despotic with term limits is it? Putin has ripped Russia's constitution to bits though. He's been president, then prime minister, then president again, and then he'll go back to prime-minister no doubt. How long has he been in control now? 15? 18 years? With no end in sight is there?
Elmer Blooker wrote: » Bulgaria could have done with the money from transit fees but I guess they pulled out because they didn't want McCain and Nuland handing out cookies in Sofia.
Egginacup wrote: » The US Constitution is intact, that's a good one. Are you familiar with the part of the US Constitution whereby it states that all treaties entered into are the "supreme law of the land" Now without consequence, from Vietnam, to Lebanon, to Panama, to Grenada, to Somalia, to Iraq, to Afghanistan( which we invaded and massacred towns and villages till the US got involved and spoiled it for us , to Iraq again, to Serbia, to Libya, to Pakistan, to Yemen all we supplied with thousands of tons of cheap tanks ,migs,hind gunships . We also conquered and carried out a massacre in Czechoslovakia to but hey that was in Europe Are you familiar with the international ban on torture to which the US is a signatory? Yet Obama admits "some folks were tortured". How cutesy of him. I haven't thought this out very well, Now if i want i can excuse away all these (and many more) crimes by say that the US is bad as putin , Hitler or Stalin Doesn't put me in great standing regardless, does it?
Egginacup wrote: » I'm not so sure. Expose embarrassing truths about the US government can be very hazardous to your health. Just ask Dan Rather, Phil Donoghue, Julian assange, Joseph Wilson, Edward Snowden, giulia sgrena, Bradley Chelsea manning, etc., etc.
Egginacup wrote: » The US Constitution is intact, that's a good one.
InTheTrees wrote: » Compared to putins ability to steal a coutry from its citizens, yes. Sure.
Elmer Blooker wrote: » Putin's biggest crime is NOT allowing western business interests to steal and loot his country like whats happening in Ukraine.
BoJack Horseman wrote: » Was Eggy raped by someone in an Uncle Sam costume or something? Such naked hate toward a country & its people.... Every single post... Hate, hate & more hate! As remarkable as it is sad!
Korat wrote: » Most of Ukraine's productive industries are based in the Donbass region. Which Russia has occupied. If anyone is stealing and looting it's Putin.
Fiery mutant wrote: » True, he likes to do that all by himself.
Egginacup wrote: » Russia has NOT occupied Eastern Ukraine. Stop lying. But at least we're back on topic. So like I requested earlier, can you provide any evidence of this Russian occupation of Eastern Ukraine?
Egginacup wrote: » If you are referring to Crimea then you sound like a ****ing broken record. Crimea was in Russia for centuries until it was illegally given to Ukraine by Kruschev in 1954.
Egginacup wrote: » Putin doesn't wish this to happen obviously so quickly returned Crimea to Russia.
pcardin wrote: » Going by your logic would you Russians mind giving back Koenigsberg (Kaliningrad) and Kuril Islands, and some more occupied territories please? Thank you! Returned?! Something that officially belong to other country?! Isn't that called occupation, invasion?
Gatling wrote: » That not what i read he's wanted for questioning on sexual assaults. yes
BoJack Horseman wrote: » Is not bagging up a criminal offence in Sweden? News to me, and Sweden!
Grayson wrote: » It's a little bit more nuanced that that but it is close. I think (someone correct me if i'm wrong) but the sentence he would have gotten upon conviction is less than the time he's spent in the embassy in London. He says he will go to Sweden if he's given assurances that her won't be sent to the US from there
Earlier this year, Sarah is reported to have posted a telling entry on her website, which she has since removed. But a copy has been retrieved and widely circulated on the internet. Entitled ‘7 Steps to Legal Revenge’, it explains how women can use courts to get their own back on unfaithful lovers. Step 7 says: ‘Go to it and keep your goal in sight. Make sure your victim suffers just as you did.’ (The highlighting of text is Sarah’s own.) Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1336291/Wikileaks-Julian-Assanges-2-night-stands-spark-worldwide-hunt.html#ixzz3UAmjb3OG
Elmer Blooker wrote: » I've gave up asking for evidence a long time ago, no one can provide any except for those childish images courtesy of NATO. Heres a good one, Kiev announced that they destroyed a column of Russian armour inside Ukraine, this would have been a MAJOR propaganda coup, but could they come up with a single photo or any evidence?http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/15/ukraine-says-russian-vehicles-territory
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » More western imperialist oil grabbing capitalist lies:http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/19/russia-official-silence-for-families-troops-killed-in-ukraine
RecordStraight wrote: » Typical lies from right-wing Neo-con rag.... *cough*
cnocbui wrote: » Define 'evidence' I can supply what to me is evidence but I suspect you would just claim otherwise. Are captured Russian troops evidence? Are social media photos of Russian troops and equipment in Ukraine evidence? Are personal papers and official identity documents taken from dead Russian soldiers evidence?
More western imperialist oil grabbing capitalist lies:
Elmer Blooker wrote: » I deleted the last paragraph, best ignored! Social media as evidence? NO! Good god!! Do people actually believe the stuff that Yatsenyuk comes up with?
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » are russian troops fighting in Ukraine there in a voluntary capacity?
Elmer Blooker wrote: » I deleted the last paragraph, best ignored! Social media as evidence? NO! Good god!! Do people actually believe the stuff that Yatsenyuk comes up with? "Yats, he's the guy, **** the EU!"
