Afroshack wrote: » Well no, I don't. How do you evaluate need? For example, if I donated blood the day before taking the train and was still very slightly woozy, but not enough to faint, does that need exceed yours? Or what if I just had a bad back but wasn't in excruciating pain? Or if someone went out the night before and was feeling sick from hungoveritis? So what is this criteria for needing a seat?
whatdoicare wrote: » Jaysis, if you're still woozy a day after giving blood you seriously need to get checked out! That's not normal!
Baby Jane wrote: » I don't know which is more petty: the "not giving up a seat as a badge of honour" thing or the arguing for the sake of it. A person with a limp/on crutches, an elderly/frail person, a person who's feeling unwell, a heavily pregnant woman. Yes I know there could be other people who have hidden ailments that could do with sitting down, but people can't be expected to acknowledge what they can't see. If it's visible though, it's just basic consideration and a little bit of empathy - what's become so undesirable about these qualities? To refuse to offer a seat just because others might have invisible disabilities seems like a cop-out.
Afroshack wrote: » Haha, no I'm not but its just an example! I mean, at what point does one persons situation override another's? How woozy or faint must I feel to turn down a person who is elderly/ pregnant but in reality is fine standing? Baby Jane said it should be obvious when someone needs to sit- I asked how do you evaluate said need on the scale of needing to sit down?
Baby Jane wrote: » I don't know which is more petty: the "not giving up a seat as a badge of honour" thing or the arguing for the sake of it (I mean that in general, not just you 'Froshack). A person with a limp/on crutches, an elderly/frail person, a person who's feeling unwell, a heavily pregnant woman. Yes I know there could be other people who have hidden ailments that could do with sitting down, but people can't be expected to acknowledge what they can't see. If it's visible though, it's just basic consideration and a little bit of empathy - what's become so undesirable about these qualities? To refuse to offer a seat just because others might have invisible disabilities seems like a cop-out.
whatdoicare wrote: » I thought there used to be seating with a pregnant woman and elderly person sticker on that says you have to give up the seat if either needs it. Do they not do that anymore? .
One eyed Jack wrote: » Brilliant! Yes, of course I offer up my seat when I see another person may need it more than I do. I don't expect other people to give up their seat for me though, so all these people imagining scenarios to justify their not giving up their seat, it'd be easier to admit you just couldn't be arsed than "what if they have this, that and the other". My body is riddled with arthritis, I'm in constant pain and some days I have to use crutches to get around. I still wouldn't mind giving up a fcuking seat to someone who I feel needs it more than I do. I'm not going to die for not giving up a seat and it's simply a mannerly gesture, something small that doesn't require much effort on my part to make someone else's life that little bit easier.
sup_dude wrote: » I'm all for giving up my seat. Most of the time I just stand anyway, even if there is seats. My point was that I don't think it's for other people to judge if someone else doesn't automatically get up.
galljga1 wrote: » I have given up my seat to both pregnant ladies and elderly persons. 40+ now but I have always done so. On one occasion, I got up and had to walk a bit down a carriage to get the attention of a pregnant lady to offer her my seat. When I turned back, my seat had been taken by a young twat who was not for moving. I whispered sweet nothings in his ear..... he moved.
lollpop wrote: » Pregnancy isn't a disability but growing a human in your belly can be exhausting so a seat would always be appreciated!
Mark Tapley wrote: » 40 Jesus ! I am 50 and well able to stand on my own two feet. Yes I would give up my seat to someone I thought needed it.
One eyed Jack wrote: » I don't think anyone was judging anyone who doesn't automatically get up though, it was more the posters who were coming out with all manner of excuses as to why someone wouldn't automatically get up. I don't think the OP expected anyone to get up, she was just wondering do they? People making excuses as to why a person wouldn't get up are being entirely disingenuous IMO and rallying against a point that was never made (this "sense of entitlement"), kinda funny the lack of self-awareness in rallying against perceptions of self-entitlement though if you think about it.