valoren wrote: » It was a classic piece of Trolling by them to be fair.]
batnolan wrote: » Had in their supplement a few weeks back declaring the Recession to be over, the Tiger to be back and had a host of z-list celebrities pictured drinking champagne? Google hasn't turned up what I am looking for.
batnolan wrote: » Had in their supplement a few weeks back declaring the Recession to be over, the Tiger to be back and had a host of z-list celebrities pictured drinking champagne? .
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » First of all it was a few MONTHS back Second of all , anyone who didn't loose their job or take a pay cut was never in recession for them things just got cheaper
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » First of all it was a few MONTHS back
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » Second of all , anyone who didn't loose their job or take a pay cut was never in recession for them things just got cheaper
Tell me how wrote: » I used to buy a Sunday paper and keep it for the guts of the week, keeping it on the table and reading it throughout various mealtimes. One of the luxuries of having the house to myself I suppose. During that period, it was always "The Sunday Tribune". I loved it. I used to catch myself listening about various events during the week and thinking "I wonder what so and so' take in the Tribune will be about that" and used to love most columnists in it. Was upset when I heard it would be finishing. I tried both the IT and SBP for a couple of months each after that but never enjoyed it as much. A lot of the journalists from The Tribune are still writing in weekly national papers but have never been drawn to a paper in the same way. Now it's Time Magazine which is on the Table for the week, it's fine but is global commentary rather than a national one and so don't enjoy it as much. Would step around the SINDO if it was on the ground in front of me, I don't want sh*te on my shoes.
Greyian wrote: » Did these people who didn't lose their jobs/take a pay cut also manage to dodge the introduction of USC and various other new taxes?