Karl Stein wrote: » When I was watching the Munster v Scarlets game on Saturday afternoon I couldn't help but think the Scarlets quick anticipatory rush up could be easily exploited by a dummy-pass by the scrum-half quickly followed by a genuine pass to get penalties for offside. Is there some sort of rule that prevents this play?
padser wrote: » You must add to it "when an offside line is created" and specify that "offside lines are created when a tackle is made or a kick is taken". .
Swan Curry wrote: » I was watching a scrum in the Scotland-Italy match that went near the touchline, and a thought came to me. What happens if a scrum goes over the touchline with the ball still in the scrum?
Whosthis wrote: » Italy's try under the posts just before half time. The TMO declared that it was a single movement. The try scorer attempts to ground the ball on the inside of the padding, moves around the front of the padding and grounds the ball on the outside of the padding. He may have also switched hands and I believe at least one knee was on the ground from the beginning. how was this deemed a single movement? Am I missing something?
Taco Corp wrote: » would someone be able to define what open play is...
Taco Corp wrote: » ...and what the offside rule is in open play?
locum-motion wrote: » When the ball is in play but there isn't a scrum, lineout, ruck, maul or tackle happening, and the ball hasn't just been kicked. Simple. There is none.
blackwhite wrote: » There is one. After a knock-on, a teammate of the player who knocked on is in an offside position if they are in front of the knock on.
WMitty wrote: » Lineout Q. Team A win the ball. On returning to ground the catcher retains possession and the lifters bind on. Team B initially withdraw but on seeing the catcher keeping the ball they send in ONE player to tackle. On tacking contact the catcher transfers the ball. Can the tackler now be pinged for collapsing a maul?
phog wrote: » Another LO question. Team A take the ball and form a maul with Team B, the stay within the 5m and 15m lines and maul. How far can they maul go before the lo is deemed to be over and before players not involved in the LO can join in? Could they go the lenght of the field and score without the LO being called over?
Lineout ends. When a ruck or maul develops in a lineout, and all the feet of all the players in the ruck or maul move beyond the line of touch, the lineout ends.
sydthebeat wrote: » doesnt this cover it?
locum-motion wrote: » Simple. There is none.
Taco Corp wrote: » would someone be able to define what open play is and what the offside rule is in open play?
locum-motion wrote: » 3. At a scrum:One player not in the scrum may be at the side of it. For that player, on the team that doesn't have the ball at its feet, the offside line runs through the ball as long as he stays on that side of the scrum. If he opts to nip round the other side, he becomes subject to the same line as the rest of his team. (On the team that does have the ball at their feet, for that player, I'm not sure if there actually is one, but I suppose there must be.) Players in the scrum must remain in it. If they opt to leave, then they become subject to the same line as the rest of the team. (Think this law may have changed - for U19s at least) For everyone else, the offside line runs through the back of the hindmost foot of their teammates who are in the scrum. When the scrum ends, the offside lines vanish.
locum-motion wrote: » 4. At the lineout: [*]For everyone else, the offside line is 10m away from the line of touch. [*]When the lineout ends, the offside lines vanish. [/LIST]
Interested Observer wrote: » You've left out some detail on the kicking bit above too, if your teammate kicks and you're in front of him the 10m rule applies.
Dave_The_Sheep wrote: » This was one I didn't know about. I thought that once the kicker passed you, you were onside. Never knew you had to retreat 10m as well.
Interested Observer wrote: » If you're in front of the kicker the law states you have to be seen to retreat 10m. If you don't you're offside. In reality a lot of refs will allow some leeway, I can imagine it's very hard to police tbh when you've 10 players to watch.
Swiwi. wrote: » My understanding is that you must retreat but that once the kicker (or someone behind the kicker at the moment of the kick) goes in front of you you are back onside. In the weekend POC (I think) never made the effort to retreat hence pinged for offside.
Quin_Dub wrote: » Not quite..... I actually had a long discussion with Peter Fitzgibbon a while back at a referees training session on this topic. What he told me was this.. If you are more than 10m from the catcher/where the ball lands, then you can stand still and be put onside by the kicker or someone who was behind the kicker when he kicked.. You can also be put onside by the catcher , once he moves more than 5m.OR PASSES THE BALL if you are inside that 10m zone , you must retreat no matter what else happens YES, UNDER 10M YOU CANNOT BE PUT ONSIDE BY THE ACTIONS OF THE CATCHER..
Quin_Dub wrote: » Not quite..... I actually had a long discussion with Peter Fitzgibbon a while back at a referees training session on this topic.** What he told me was this.. If you are more than 10m from the catcher/where the ball lands, then you can stand still and be put onside by the kicker or someone who was behind the kicker when he kicked.. You can also be put onside by the catcher , once he moves more than 5m. if you are inside that 10m zone , you must retreat no matter what else happens.. ** Because I'd been "approached" (screamed and shouted at) by the management of a team after a match that I had penalised for offside in this manner (inside the 10m) at a crucial moment in a game and took the opportunity to ask a real ref if I'd been right...
Swiwi. wrote: » Hmmm. Law 11.4bWhile moving away, the offside player cannot be put onside by any action of the opposing team. However, before the player has moved the full 10 metres, the player can be put onside by any onside team-mate who runs in front of the player. Think I might be right actually.