TMJK wrote: » To save me from my absolute panic does anyone have a copy of the Sept 2014 Constitutional paper?? It'd be very very much appreciated!
S12b wrote: » Don't listen to the talk that Courtney is a really hard marker. Not to be a d**k, but these claims are always made by people who failed the exam, and so it's a mistake which has dragged their marks down, not Courtney's marking. I put in the same amount of work for all the exams, I was able to write 5 solid answers in each exam and when I got my results, they were all pretty much the same....give or take 5 or 6 marks. A good answer paper is a good answer paper....answer 5 questions where you actually address the specific question asked and provide 2 or 3 bits of authority and you will fly through....when I sat my first four, I wondered the exact same thing but the standard required is no different to college!! I can't stress it enough, 5 answers on point with a few relevant cases and you will pass with no problems.
southcounty wrote: » Started EU today completely baffled by direct effect already...haven't a hope!!
prior212 wrote: » For Company: Is doing- SLP, All directors, Shares and share transfer, corporate borrowings, minority protection and disposition of assets, enough to get by?
vickyplumx wrote: » Has anyone stayed in bewleys newlands cross for these. I'm sitting contract so have to drive up the 17th and stay that night. Red cow is booked out and ibis is 149 😱 robbery as it's so basic! Just wondering re bewleys is it close enough ?
vickyplumx wrote: » Oh my god what???! There's a new court?! ****
EthanSS wrote: » Does anybody have any notes on the new Court of Appeal for Criminal Law? Could it be left off the paper as it's so new? Thanks in advance.
LawCQ91 wrote: » Thanks for the quick reply, I might as well..
TinkledPink wrote: » I skipped it.
LawCQ91 wrote: » quick Question , for the chapter in Courts for constitutional I know the bit about public admin of justice/removal of judges/Independence might come up... Anyone know if the bit about Courts of local/limited jurisdiction/HC/SC and special Criminal Court ever come up on it's own before? I just can't see how it can be examined? Or Am i missing something here.
LawCQ91 wrote: » From what I can gather, the lady in independent colleges doesn't think Right to jury is going to come up at all... so I am leaving it out. But I guess if you are doing Criminal anyway there is prob no harm. you had two 'Findings of Unconstitutionality' I presume one of it you meant JR ?
smeal wrote: » Ok I've summed up what I'm doing for Constitutional. Had to leave out a few things because I just don't have time. 1) Due Course 2) S.O.P 3) Findings of Unconstitutionality 4) Institutions of State (although I did only cover basics) 5) Principles of Fundamental Rights 6) Findings of Unconstitutionality 7) Right to a Jury 8) Property Rights 9) Abortion 10) Freedom of Speech Do I have enough? I decided to leave out equality.. No time!
dashdoll wrote: » Any thoughts on covering the following for Property? Succession Adverse Possession Finding/Treasure Trove Co-Ownership Family Home Protection Easements Proprietary Estoppel Wonder am I cutting it a bit fine?
