total former wrote: » Barnes was always known as a "homer" when Ireland were playing away. When we were playing Wales last year, he was anti-Ireland. Now he's an "away" ref apparently. When the ref gets in the way, the team in possession gets a scrum. That's the rule.
Podge_irl wrote: » I don't think any official distinction exists. A test is just a test.
kuang1 wrote: » Anyone know what happens if we win our next 10 competitive games?!
CIARAN_BOYLE wrote: » World cup win
Yeah_Right wrote: » World record for test wins. And not just the just Tier 1 record.
errlloyd wrote: » I don't think that is true, if it is it certainly hasn't always been true. When he reffed Clermont v Leinster in 2012 his record was something like 1 away win in 27 games.
Do You Even Squat wrote: » I agree fitzy isnt a 15 but he is a smashing 13. i prefer him playing out on the wing but he has been the form 13 in ireland this year (along with Henshaw).
leakyboots wrote: » Hnmmm, a few games back where he has impressed for sure. But Darren Cave has been in unreal form for Ulster in 2015. Earls looks sensational too. I'd have Fitz/Earls ahead of Payne to be honest. Did I read somewhere that we had 0 linebreaks against France?
Clearlier wrote: » If I'm thinking about the correct incident he had gotten in the way of play a few seconds before. If I'm being generous he needed a few seconds to work out what he should do in such a situation. It was unfortunate because his impeding of play looked to me to have disadvantaged Ireland. Thing to remember about Barnes is that he's an 'away' referee. If in doubt he favours the away side. It's very unusual but makes a lot (not all obviously) of his decisions easier to comprehend when viewed through that prism although this on in particular was just IMO him taking his time to come to a decision which I think probably adhered to the letter of the law.
TommyOM wrote: » Earls has had a chance at 13 and has proven time and time again that he does not have the vision or skillset for 13 at international rugby. He excells on the wing.
Deleted User wrote: » Yeah I think he could do a job there in a Schmidt coached team but certainly there are others who would come in ahead of him.
Brewster wrote: » Earls should focus on wing position, he could actually suffer a little if he continues to play 13 for Munster. He is simply defensively not good enough to play 13 in the modern way rugby has evolved. He has also been shown up time and time again to be lacking in awareness In terms of players around him. A fine fine winger but not good enough defensively to play 13....
Mahatma Geansai wrote: » Looks like people are still banging the drum about the one time he didn't pass to BOD. It'd be interesting to see the reaction if he was the one to mess up a routine 4 on 2 and guaranteed try against France. He offers a good kick chase, and his rucking is excellent. That's two of the primary prerequisites for an Irish outside back right off the bat. His line-breaking threat and open-field running is comfortably the best in the country.
vienne86 wrote: » Earls is a fabulous player - on the wing. I know he can play 13, but he is a far better winger, and I think he should concentrate on that position.
Mahatma Geansai wrote: » Earls showed more at 13 in the 2012 than any of our other available 13s have to date. He had a great tournament, and he was one of the few Irish players to do so. Earls is also a significantly more well-rounded player than he was three years ago.
molloyjh wrote: » So I won the Ulster Bank flag bearer competition for the England game. Nice.
[Deleted User] wrote: » So you get to walk out onto the pitch holding Paul O'Connell's hand? :pac:
molloyjh wrote: » I should be so lucky. No I'll be one of the eejits with the flags in the warm up. I'm sure I'll make a total balls of it but I'm getting 4 star accom on the Saturday night and 2 free tickets.
total former wrote: » Just have faith in yourself
irishbucsfan wrote: » Did you already have tickets? If not that is even better!