K4t wrote: » Saying he is responsible is like saying Islam is responsible. People have to account for their own individual actions, while at the same time we should be free to criticise Islam without accusations of Islamophobia or racism towards Muslims.
Vandango wrote: » Ya, let's bury our heads in the sand and conveniently overlook American foreign policy for the last 35 years. Might be better to treat the disease as well as the symptoms.
Boring username wrote: » Islam =/= Muslims
wretcheddomain wrote: » Multiculturalism has failed spectacularly.
Dan_Solo wrote: » Time we kicked out the Celts, Vikings, Normans, Brits and Poles and restored our glorious druid monoculture!
bjork wrote: » While I agree that each individual is responsible for their own actions, this guy proactively led a campaign and traveled to other countries to stir up as much rioting as he could. This guy as an individual, has to account for his actions Now he's sorry
K4t wrote: » That is enough for me; that his mind has potentially been changed. It's sad that it took murder (not committed or caused by him) to make that happen, but it is a good thing overall. If only now we can change the minds of others without the need for the bloodshed.
reprise wrote: » NOT(!(!(Islam = Muslims))) surely?
RobYourBuilder wrote: » Krudttønden translates to powder keg, right? Can anyone speak Danish?
wretcheddomain wrote: » I'm an advocate of interculturalism - the argument that says different cultures and ethnic groups are welcome in society, but only if they meld into the existing values that society has
DeadHand wrote: » War has been declared on the West and it doesn't even realise yet.
Dan_Solo wrote: » They're welcome as long as they're identical to us... there's a name for that, yes, monoculture. Well done.
Dan_Solo wrote: » There's over 200 drug related deaths a year in Denmark. What's the Islamoterrorism average? Around zero deaths per year? There's a war on but it has fook all to do with Arabs.
Nodin wrote: » Because most of us left the notion of mass guilt behind in the middle ages.
Voltex wrote: » Thats a ridiculous argument. The point of what has happened across Europe over the last few weeks is that there is a fundamental assault on some of the most basic rights we have..namely freedom of expression and speech.
Henry9 wrote: » What's it called when someone deliberately misunderstands something in order to portray it as an extreme position with which they can then disagree? Well done indeed.
Henry9 wrote: » Oh for fcuk sake. Thanks a lot moral equivalence.
Dan_Solo wrote: » Is it called you making stuff up that didn't happen? Not at all. It's just there so much waffle about a few deaths across the entire EU and nobody gives a **** about what the real issues are.
bpmurray wrote: » There has been a number of incidents where the local muslim extremists have tried to change society in DK. They cancelled Christmas in one residential area when they managed to get a majority onto the residents' committee, (overruled by the residents themselves who told them where to go) They have pretty much taken over at least one football club, stopping the sale of alcohol and requiring modest dress, They tried to prevent elections and blocked people from voting, claiming that democracy was un-islamic. So they have been pretty active, although the body count is pretty low. I think the earliest one I remember was some guy trying to bomb an office in the center of Copenhagen but he blew himself up - that would have been 25 years ago, so it's definitely not new. And it's certainly not zero.
darkpagandeath wrote: » I think you will find, There are a lot of people that give a **** about people in their communities being radicalised and committing murders for an ideal.
Dan_Solo wrote: » Well you've rather spectacularly skipped the point. Do people give 200 times as much effort and waffling time to the Danish drug problem? No, do they hell. It suits an agenda to make out a few deaths a year from terrorism is world war 3. More people die from botched plastic surgery or cattle stampedes in Europe and I'm not seeing the headlines.
Dan_Solo wrote: » I said close to zero so thanks for confirming. So what you are complaining about in all your examples is democracy where Muslims have voted in changes? Let me guess, we need to suspend democracy in order to preserve our freedom? Oh great...
darkpagandeath wrote: » None of them are running around killing people in the name of an ideology.
BlaasForRafa wrote: » Other bad things happen so you shouldn't talk about this thing. The usual first response of someone who wants to shut down a discussion. So, lets all brush it under the carpet and pretend there's no problem, that's that sorted then eh.
Dan_Solo wrote: » This is vitally important even though it's relatively trivial. The usual first response when somebody can't accept the fact that's their pet gripe is small fry in the grand scheme of things.
