Boom__Boom wrote: » I have wondered for a while about the possibility of getting hold of a non-consecrated Church that has fallen out of use and simply renting it out so that anyone who wants could hold a civil ceremony (and soon hopefully a civil wedding) there. I'm convinced there are a serious chunk of the folk who get married in churches get married in a church because it is a Church in the architectural sense as opposed to having anything at all to do with religion.
Galilea Cold Miner wrote: » I don't see them every day as I live a few hours away as it stands but my plan for the future is to settle down and build at home next door to my home house (as many of my close friends have done or are doing). I think it's very sad how people don't want to be close to their parents and have them as part of their day to day lives.
FairytaleGirl wrote: » It is something I have considered but not really looked into. I dont have an issue with the catholic religion itself - more the man made aspects - like judgement of others and disregarding basic principles (love thy neighbor)
Wompa1 wrote: » It seems like a lot of Irish men in particular, go home to mammy a few times a month.
Galilea Cold Miner wrote: » A positive trait without a doubt surely? What's wrong with visiting home regularly?
Ghost Buster wrote: » But its all man made!
kylith wrote: » Because it smacks of someone who not only hasn't cut the apron strings but is also incapable of doing his own washing. Especially if he expects to consult his parents on everything and intends to live next door to them. What would you do if your partner was the same and consulted her parents for every decision and her parent's advised the opposite of your parents?
Galilea Cold Miner wrote: » Well as she is in and out of her home place a few times a week it's safe to say it's seen as normal and a good trait that I'm close to my parents. I will never understand this nonsense comments of "cutting the apron strings". Being close to your parents who are your closest family and the people who raised you should standard. It's very sad I have to say how some people feel the need to distance themselves, they may very well regret it when their parents are gone.
bluewolf wrote: » Yeah but what if both sets of parents give conflicting advice
eviltwin wrote: » You can still be close to your parents and have a good relationship with them with having to live next door.
Galilea Cold Miner wrote: » I will never understand this nonsense comments of "cutting the apron strings". Being close to your parents who are your closest family and the people who raised you should be standard. It's very sad I have to say how some people feel the need to distance themselves, they may very well regret it when their parents are gone. There is a far bigger deal being made by some posters about how I run things past my parents also, you would swear I was asking if I should have a cup of tea or not it's obviously only important decisions which I don't see why should advise should not be looked for rather than making rash decisions like many people do.
Galilea Cold Miner wrote: » I've 5 weddings this year and only one of the 5 isn't a church wedding, all the rest are full proper weddings.
shruikan2553 wrote: » The council of mammies will meet up and find a solution for them.
Galilea Cold Miner wrote: » Basing it on the fact I've been invited to one wedding that's a civil ceremony in 30 years on this planet. 6 wedding in 2015 and only 1 out of 6 is not a full on traditional wedding.
Wompa1 wrote: » You gotta pop that t1tty outta ya mouth at some stage. Parents are your main support structure but when you become an adult you need to become independent. It seems like a lot of Irish men in particular, go home to mammy a few times a month. Us Irish men and the Italians have a reputation built on that...it's a bit sad. Like others are saying. If you can't take being away from them for too long, you're likely not going to go against them on any of your big decisions if you think it might risk damaging that relationship and comfort.
marco_polo wrote: » We had a civil reception which was probably the first one a lot of the neighbours were ever at, I reckon any who we a little skeptical soon came around when they were back in the bar 30 minutes after the cermony :pac:.
Magenta wrote: » You realise that weddings that don't take place in a church are still "proper"?
Galilea Cold Miner wrote: » Well it's a legal wedding of course but without the church part it does lack a significant part of the meaning of a wedding from a catholic perspective so it really depending on your definition of what a wedding is or involves. I'll being going to a very good friends wedding later this year, going to be over 300 people at it full on traditional wedding over two days. That will feel like a proper do compared to a small ceremony in an office followed by a bit of food and drinks with a small crowd in pub or whatever. In opinion it wouldn't feel like a wedding.
suicide_circus wrote: » I pop back home a couple of times a month to visit my parents because I love and respect them and they won't be around forever. If that makes me an embarrassing mammys boy then so be it, no regrets here.