nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

No gays allowed

TheMilkyPirate

Me and the GF are looking for a villa in the canaries atm for a holiday in April, Trawling through the usual sites including owners-direct when I stumbled upon this gem today:

http://www.ownersdirect.co.uk/accommodation/p8054482

Nice villa nothing to untoward until you get to the notes on accommodation where it states

"Please do not smoke within any rooms in the villa ash trays are provided outside at the patio areas. families and couples only, no same sex couples"

Aside from being highly immoral is this legal?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

reprise

shruikan2553 wrote: »

So they are sexist.

You arent going to have to suck a cock to get in

Actually, the adults were discussing whether it was bigoted.

The_Valeyard

eviltwin wrote: »

Their house, their rules. As a parent I wouldn't get offended by a villa with a 'no kid's' policy. You have to wonder what the problem is though.

These are the hotels and villas I book, no offense to parents but when I go away, I do not want the shouting, screaming and running around of little kids all over the place. Nice quiet, chilled out. aaaaahhhhh, holidays mmmmmmm

eviltwin

efb wrote: »

Then they shouldn't use it as a business

They probably shouldn't but they are so they can accept who they want

shruikan2553

bjork wrote: »

If you read past the first ad on the link, there are others

"Exclusively gay"

"Men Only"

So they are sexist.

You arent going to have to suck a cock to get in

bjork

shruikan2553 wrote: »

At least read what you link.

If you read past the first ad on the link, there are others

"Exclusively gay"

"Men Only"

efb

eviltwin wrote: »

It is bigotry and I wouldn't book this villa for my holiday in light of that but I believe people should be free to decide who stays in their home.

Then they shouldn't use it as a business

eviltwin

bb1234567 wrote: »

Theres reasons for not wanting kids, i.e.. breaking valuables..
Whats the reason for no gays? The only one is bigotry

It is bigotry and I wouldn't book this villa for my holiday in light of that but I believe people should be free to decide who stays in their home.

shruikan2553

reprise wrote: »

And this one isn't?

http://www.travelgayeurope.com/gran-canaria-gay-hotels/

Do explain.

The town’s gay (straight-friendly) hotels offer excellent value for money.

At least read what you link.

eviltwin

reprise wrote: »

And this one isn't?

http://www.travelgayeurope.com/gran-canaria-gay-hotels/

Do explain.

Gay friendly doesn't mean gay only

OneArt

I think this one is obvious.

Gays will see past the cheap furniture and lazy interior design. Then they'll go on Yelp and that's the end of their little money maker.

reprise

bb1234567 wrote: »

Theres reasons for not wanting kids, i.e.. breaking valuables..
Whats the reason for no gays? The only one is bigotry

And this one isn't?

http://www.travelgayeurope.com/gran-canaria-gay-hotels/

Do explain.

bb1234567

eviltwin wrote: »

Their house, their rules. As a parent I wouldn't get offended by a villa with a 'no kid's' policy. You have to wonder what the problem is though.

Theres reasons for not wanting kids, i.e.. breaking valuables..
Whats the reason for no gays? The only one is bigotry

eviltwin

TheMilkyPirate wrote: »

So people in the states had a right to refuse to serve black people make them use separate bathrooms not partake in sports and not enter certain schools?

It was their right so we should have just let them at it. The world doesn't need to move forward or anything.

That's a business, totally different to your home where it's not a crime to refuse entry to people.

Venus In Furs

TheMilkyPirate wrote: »

So people in the states had a right to refuse to serve black people make them use separate bathrooms not partake in sports and not enter certain schools?

That was state policy though, this is a private enterprise. I don't know though - could be a bit of a legal grey area.

But even though it's their home and so on and so forth, people can still criticise the policy.

TheMilkyPirate

eviltwin wrote: »

It's their home. I don't agree with them but if they have issues with it that's their right to refuse it.

So people in the states had a right to refuse to serve black people make them use separate bathrooms not partake in sports and not enter certain schools?

It was their right so we should have just let them at it. The world doesn't need to move forward or anything.

eviltwin

TheMilkyPirate wrote: »

Why would you it's perfectly understandable, Kids draw on walls; break things. Gays however are the same as any other couple and it's nothing but pure discrimination to not allow them in your villa because of their sexual orientation.

It's their home. I don't agree with them but if they have issues with it that's their right to refuse it.

El Weirdo

scudzilla wrote: »

... i suppose the gay brigade will be all over this too

Eoin O'Duffy's been dead for years.

bjork

TheMilkyPirate wrote: »

Why would you it's perfectly understandable, Kids draw on walls; break things. Gays however are the same as any other couple and it's nothing but pure discrimination to not allow them in your villa because of their sexual orientation.

How about "Men only"?

Do women draw on walls too?

TheMilkyPirate

eviltwin wrote: »

Their house, their rules. As a parent I wouldn't get offended by a villa with a 'no kid's' policy. You have to wonder what the problem is though.

Why would you it's perfectly understandable, Kids draw on walls; break things. Gays however are the same as any other couple and it's nothing but pure discrimination to not allow them in your villa because of their sexual orientation.

bjork

Awful discrimination

Here's more I found

"Exclusively gay resort"
"Adults only"
"Men only"

http://www.travelgayeurope.com/gran-canaria-gay-hotels/

Hound them out of buisness

efb

scudzilla wrote: »

Can't see the problem with this, it's their home, their choice. Maybe religious grounds are the reason.

Same as the cake shop up North really, but i suppose the gay brigade will be all over this too

when you run a business, laws come into play...

Cookie_Monster

scudzilla wrote: »

Can't see the problem with this, it's their home, their choice. Maybe religious grounds are the reason.

Same as the cake shop up North really, but i suppose the gay brigade will be all over this too

Yes and no. If they said no blacks / Irish / Asian instead, do you think that would be ok?

Surely you just book it as two individual guys / girls to get around it anyway?

eviltwin

scudzilla wrote: »

Can't see the problem with this, it's their home, their choice. Maybe religious grounds are the reason.

Same as the cake shop up North really, but i suppose the gay brigade will be all over this too

Their house, their rules. As a parent I wouldn't get offended by a villa with a 'no kid's' policy. You have to wonder what the problem is though.

bb1234567

Pathetic.

maameeo

i wouldnt stay in a place that didnt accept a couple due to gender, its against my non religion.

reprise

TheMilkyPirate wrote: »

Aside from being highly immoral is this legal?

Whatever about legality, morality is far from objective.

scudzilla

Can't see the problem with this, it's their home, their choice. Maybe religious grounds are the reason.

Same as the cake shop up North really, but i suppose the gay brigade will be all over this too

Ray Palmer

TheMilkyPirate wrote: »

Aside from being highly immoral is this legal?

Illegal in Ireland for sure and I would say also in Spain as they are probably members of the European Court of Human Rights

mikeym

Someone is homophobic.

ygolometsipe

ok butt, can I cum?