Ray Palmer wrote: » Kayne West
Ray Palmer wrote: » Is he really that deluded?
gramar wrote: » Why anyone would give a toss about what Kanye West comes out with is beyond me.
Mr Freeze wrote: » Nobody will be listening to his sh1te music in 20 or 30 years time.
Karl Stein wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDMfTkxvHsY
nullzero wrote: » The man has proven himself to be a racist in the past.
RWCNT wrote: » The grammys is meaningless anyway.
jamesbere wrote: » dafuq
Mr Freeze wrote: » Couldn't agree more. He has little between the ears and nobody should listen to the rubbish he spews. Nobody will be listening to his sh1te music in 20 or 30 years time. He thinks he is the greatest performer/musician of all time. In my opinion I think he one of the most overrated.
nullzero wrote: » Kanye West wouldn't be getting behind Beyoncé if she wasn't black. The man has proven himself to be a racist in the past. His music is dreadful and his public persona is that of a complete fool. Everything he says can be dismissed out of hand.
floggg wrote: » Well this is an equally stupid opinion as Kanye's. You may not be a fan of his music, or hip-hop generally, but he is pretty much regarded as a musical genius within hip-hop and urban music.An arrogant, space cadet of a genius, but a musical genius none the less. Even his auto tune abomination of an album was pretty well received by auto tune abomination aficionados. Calling his music ****e just because you don't happen to like it or him is as stupid as him calling Beck less of an artist than Beyoncé just because Beck ain't bootylicious and married to his bestie.
Tiger Mcilroy wrote: » I wholeheartedly disagree.
floggg wrote: » Calling his music ****e just because you don't happen to like it or him is as stupid as him calling Beck less of an artist than Beyoncé just because Beck ain't bootylicious and married to his bestie.
floggg wrote: » That's fine. Kanye wholeheartedly disagrees with those who consider Beck a great artist. But the objective truth is that both are incredibly talented at what they do, even if what they do isn't everyvodys cup of tea.
Mr Freeze wrote: » I don't like Beck either I should have added. Kanye could be the most eloquently spoken and nicest person ever, and I would still dislike his muwhichsic.
floggg wrote: » Which is fine. You don't have to. But calling it ****e that nobody will listen to is just ignorant and close minded.
Ray Palmer wrote: » I accept there are taste differences but I am not sure what makes West a "genius". What is this musical talent that is so respected? As a marketeer I will accept he has proven himself to an extent. Popularity doesn't indicate talent it can just be luck or people backing you up or going along with sheep mentality. Some people will buy into something just because of a perceived show of wealth or taste. The emperor has new clothes is a pretty old story. If West wants to claim a multi-instrumental performer who writes his own songs and music is not an artist versus a person who has 20+ people writing songs and music for them is an artist they clearly have issues. It really doesn't require much debate
Mr Freeze wrote: » I should elaborate on what I meant by the 30 years comment. I was thinking of Bohemian Rhapsody when I commented. Bohemian Rhapsody came out in 1975 and we hear it quite a bit on the radio, and to me anyways, its a real treat when its on. I don't think anything Kanye can ever produce will ever be liked as much as that and won't be played any where near as much on the radio in the future and certainly not in 20 years + time. That is just my opinion, and of course it could be completely wrong and we could be hearing Kanye forever, but I don't think so.