Dubgal72 wrote: » Enniscorthy 10k 2015: Chip time 42:13. Outside mcmillan prediction but overall I am very happy with the outcome. Crossing the finish line was a guaranteed PB. It's a tough course Well done to the stable and well done Dark Horse aka MKDTH. Great to meet you all (except for BON aka The Quiet Man who did a disappearing act...). Having a bit of a hypo-glycemic tremble, despite the great spread so race report later Aaah lack of food getting to me...third scorer on THE WINNING LADIES TEAM, SENIORS NOT MASTERS
laura_ac3 wrote: » Still waiting on this race report!
Mimojo wrote: » Well done DG, super running as always, enjoy the well deserved wine & chinese :-)
Runchick wrote: » Geez you're flying DG, prize money too, sweet
Duanington wrote: » Well done DG - great result !
RedRunner wrote: » Stumbled across this log and glad I did. I haven't read it all but it's entertaining on a number of fronts and some impressive performances. Keep up the good work. Some very similar targets to my own too so will be following with interest.
RacoonQueen wrote: » Savage time. Well done!
Tom Joad wrote: » Nicely done DG!!
Netwerk Errer wrote: » The PB train steams on! Great stuff DG, cracking run!:)
Dubgal72 wrote: » Haha, sorry ladies. It'll be late tonight before I get a chance...
menoscemo wrote: » Looks like you're a year late for those goals
Dubgal72 wrote: » I glanced at the garmin to check it had started ok and luckily remembered that the silly time it was showing for pace (5:30) was only it getting a 'fix'.THE GARMIN EXPERIMENT DIGRESSION After about 400m, I checked the pace (too soon?) and saw 6:xx something, can't remember but a bit faster than planned so dialled it back to 6:40. After another 300m I saw it was 6:50, more reasonable but the hill was tough enough so it felt a bit faster and harder. Yes, I checked again after a while...wasn't happy when the pace showed 7:00. This actually made me feel a bit despondent and doubts started to creep in. So I didn't look at the feckin thing again until the last KM or so. So that was my brief history of Garmin use. Some of you may suggest giving it another chance but I don't think gps watches are for me in races. I'll use a stopwatch for sure to gauge mile/KM paces. I really didn't like the snap shots I was getting, especially when I saw a pace I didn't want to see. I felt I was being limited and the race was being dictated to me, rather than the other way round.
Dubgal72 wrote: » Passed a couple of men in the last mile or so, that was a real boost. One last snap shot glance at the garmin with 500 or so to go, 6:10, I'll take that and in to finish at 42:13 chip time; 10th lady overall, 3rd over 40 and scorer on the winning team so a productive day in all.
Dubgal72 wrote: » For 2014 10k: sub 40 5mile: 30:xx 5k: 18:5x 3k: 10:30 1500: 4:5x
Dubgal72 wrote: » High? Yes. But this is why I aim higher than the moon...on the way back down I might land on a star....
Dubgal72 wrote: » Thank you for reading and getting this far
SamforMayo wrote: » Super running, congrats!
Duanington wrote: » Nice report DG - a lot more impressive times to come I suspect!
annapr wrote: » Great report and great running. I'm feeling sorry for XC girl... You probably scared her into submission.
MKDTH wrote: » Tough nut!
Bungy Girl wrote: » +1 to this. Sometimes I think half the congestion at start lines is people trying to get a 'fix' or whatever on these things. Just run, peeps! Nothing wrong with that! and time travel ... Of course you will. Probably land on Pluto or a Galaxy far far away the way you're going! Super report. Well done again.
career move wrote: » Excellent stuff Lots more to come from you
laura_ac3 wrote: » Well done DG. An impressive time. And of your goals I think the time travel will be the toughest one to crack. But sure give it a lash
adrian522 wrote: » Nice report, on the Garmin you will only get an accurate reading of your pace once you settle into the race to be honest. The first half mile it doesn't give an accurate reading really and then with it being uphill it is not really representative of effort so it may be better to wait until after the first mile before you pay any attention to it. Also there are a number of "pace" data fields you can use. Current pace is probably the worst one as it tends to jump all over the place. I use lap pace (with auto lap set to 1 mile) and also Avg Pace which gives the overall pace for the race so far.
Ososlo wrote: » Loved that report. Can't fathom how you remember so much detail! I think you should forgot the garmin altogether. It doesn't suit your feely racing and running nature. You would probably have run a bit faster starting out and gained a bit of time early on without paying for it later if you hadn't seen your pace at the start. Some debut! Great goals and no reason you won't achieve them! We're only seeing the beginnings of your capabilities. Well done.
hillsiderunner wrote: » Well done. Oooooohhhhhh those goal times!
AuldManKing wrote: » excellent work - very well deserved.
Dubgal72 wrote: » Running, log report w/beg 9 Feb (weekly mileage total for l/w: 36)Monday 9 Feb Writing this up has made me realise the mileage this week has been a little high for a pull back few days. Ooops.
laura_ac3 wrote: » I was just thinking that to myself..."where's this pull back she mentioned 4 runs back". Maybe a rest or shorter recovery run tomorrow if the legs still aren't in great shape?
Bungy Girl wrote: » Sounds fab! Wel jel, it's a perfect day to be off road. Spend those calories wisely on prosecco (how many glasses would 1300 get you ??)