Eastenders [News, Spoilers and Discussion - from Feb 2015]

emanresu esrever wrote: »

no. thats not how numbers work where i live anyway! otherwise there would be no privacy in the world!!!

yep plus people / businesses move and take their numbers with them, also can depend on the phone provider setting up the phone number etc.

TICKLE_ME_ELMO wrote: »

Ahmmmm..... yes?

No, I was just clutching at straws.

Thing is though, if it's a land line number Emma knew their mobile number too because she sent them that text. Narrows it down a bit?

Yep I think there must be some significance in the fact that it's a landline rather than a mobile.

Katgurl

when Lauren took the post-it from her shoe why did she go straight under the couch and take that file out? did she know it was there? is it hers? if so, why wasn't she keeping it in her room?

Katgurl wrote: »

when Lauren took the post-it from her shoe why did she go straight under the couch and take that file out? did she know it was there? is it hers? if so, why wasn't she keeping it in her room?

It wasn't a post it, it was the ripped corner of the page she already had.

I'm not trying to be rude but were you paying attention at all? She was looking at the files when Max came home unexpectedly so she shoved them under the couch before he saw them. She hadn't gotten a chance to move them again.

TICKLE_ME_ELMO wrote: »

Looks more like an 8 to me? 8 O'clock? Maybe?

Yep. I think the number is 0207 946 0221.

Too many digits otherwise, and SOC would make sense.

Here's an example of a format of a London number.

Yep, 0207 946 0221

020 7946 0221 is a fictitious telephone number in the 020 dialling code.

A fictitious number is one assigned for use by film and TV programme makers, so that they can have a valid-looking telephone number appropriate to the area in which the scene is set (for example, when someone in screen needs to be seen dialling a number, or looking up a number in a directory) without needing to use a number that may possibly belong to a real user.

- See more at: http://www.telephonecodes.info/number/02079460221#sthash.3qTbcq7q.dpuf

Guess at least that stops this type of thing: http://www.listandalucia.com/news/news-uk/mobile-phone-number-shown-on-eastenders-receives-2800-texts/

TICKLE_ME_ELMO wrote: »

Looks more like an 8 to me? 8 O'clock? Maybe?

no definitely not 8 o clock, she evidently uses the digit form to script time, ie 8.00 or 8.30...... why would she suddenly use that terminology. ....

lucy was on the bus at 8.00 anyway........

Zippie84 wrote: »

Yep, 0207 946 0221

020 7946 0221 is a fictitious telephone number in the 020 dialling code.

A fictitious number is one assigned for use by film and TV programme makers, so that they can have a valid-looking telephone number appropriate to the area in which the scene is set (for example, when someone in screen needs to be seen dialling a number, or looking up a number in a directory) without needing to use a number that may possibly belong to a real user.

- See more at: http://www.telephonecodes.info/number/02079460221#sthash.3qTbcq7q.dpuf

It's the British equivalent of the 555 phone numbers in America.

TICKLE_ME_ELMO wrote: »

It wasn't a post it, it was the ripped corner of the page she already had.

I'm not trying to be rude but were you paying attention at all? She was looking at the files when Max came home unexpectedly so she shoved them under the couch before he saw them. She hadn't gotten a chance to move them again.

bit harsh!! maybe she/he missed it! lets not fight, noone died.....................oh wait, they did...........

emanresu esrever wrote: »

bit harsh!! maybe she/he missed it! lets not fight, noone died.....................oh wait, they did...........

Lauren's had those files for weeks, we've seen them before, we know she's missing a bit from them, we know it's under the press in the kitchen, we know it's stuck to her shoe etc. etc.

Zippie84 wrote: »

Yep, 0207 946 0221

020 7946 0221 is a fictitious telephone number in the 020 dialling code.

A fictitious number is one assigned for use by film and TV programme makers, so that they can have a valid-looking telephone number appropriate to the area in which the scene is set (for example, when someone in screen needs to be seen dialling a number, or looking up a number in a directory) without needing to use a number that may possibly belong to a real user.

- See more at: http://www.telephonecodes.info/number/02079460221#sthash.3qTbcq7q.dpuf

Guess at least that stops this type of thing: http://www.listandalucia.com/news/news-uk/mobile-phone-number-shown-on-eastenders-receives-2800-texts/

a fictitious number used in a fictitious soap!!!:eek: i never!! the plot thickens!

emanresu esrever wrote: »

a fictitious number used in a fictitious soap!!!:eek: i never!! the plot thickens!

who would've thought eh...?

TICKLE_ME_ELMO wrote: »

Lauren's had those files for weeks, we've seen them before, we know she's missing a bit from them, we know it's under the press in the kitchen, we know it's stuck to her shoe etc. etc.

eh, i knew , you knew but i dont think its the end of the world if the other poster didnt know!! anyway, there is a crime to be solved!

fr336

Aargh for the first time in a long time I've been looking forward to EE lately...go to turn it on then remember it's not on tonight!!

dogcat

It wasn't the number of Mitchell Autos either.

dogcat wrote: »

It wasn't the number of Mitchell Autos either.

mitchell autos is the arches. i already covered that. i hope the number wasnt just plucked out of the air and has been on screen before......

"doesnt add up"...... perhaps someone gave their wrong number to emma and she couldnt account for one of the numbers that was on her phone log. perhaps one of the voicemails she received was from someone who doesnt live in the house it was called from.......

dogcat

emanresu esrever wrote: »

mitchell autos is the arches. i already covered that. i hope the number wasnt just plucked out of the air and has been on screen before......

"doesnt add up"...... perhaps someone gave their wrong number to emma and she couldnt account for one of the numbers that was on her phone log. perhaps one of the voicemails she received was from someone who doesnt live in the house it was called from.......

Sorry, I rarely watched Eastenders until January lol.

dogcat wrote: »

Sorry, I rarely watched Eastenders until January lol.

christ npt the easiest time to start watching it with all thats going on!

KKkitty

None of us know who killed Lucy yet but is there anyone who ye wouldn't like it to be? I personally don't want it to be Peter. I'm not sure I want her twin to be the culprit.

IvySlayer

Abi, Lee, Whitney, Jay and Ben I wouldn't mind seeing leave, so one of them

KKkitty wrote: »

None of us know who killed Lucy yet but is there anyone who ye wouldn't like it to be? I personally don't want it to be Peter. I'm not sure I want her twin to be the culprit.

I think I said before that given how things played out after the murder I didn't want it to be Lauren or Peter. I thought there was some really great scenes between them immediately after Lucy's death and to have it turn out to be one of them would ruin all that. By now we can rule Lauren out, I assume, but I still hope it's not Peter.

KKkitty

TICKLE_ME_ELMO wrote: »

I think I said before that given how things played out after the murder I didn't want it to be Lauren or Peter. I thought there was some really great scenes between them immediately after Lucy's death and to have it turn out to be one of them would ruin all that. By now we can rule Lauren out, I assume, but I still hope it's not Peter.

If it was Peter it wouldn't sit well with me. Hope it's not Lee either. Carters have enough storylines at the moment.

starlit

I think it be a bit weird if it were Peter. Based on his behaviour its possible but can't see it being him.

doovdela wrote: »

I think it be a bit weird if it were Peter. Based on his behaviour its possible but can't see it being him.

I think the fact that there are pictures of Jay and Peter filming for the flashback episodes would rule them out? They've been very good at keeping things under wrap all year so it seems too convenient that those pics got out. Although they could be double bluffing us?

tommer

I reckon it's denise

danois

Just spotted this on Facebook.

[Deleted User]

danois wrote: »

Just spotted this on Facebook.

Nice find

[Deleted User]

So Martin was just a cameo so ?

Also full anniversary confirmed details over the football

TUESDAY 17th FEBRUARY at 7.30pm: EastEnders (30’) with live inserts

WEDNESDAY 18th FEBRUARY at 8pm: EastEnders (30’) with live inserts

THURSDAY 19th FEBRUARY at 7.30pm: EastEnders (60’) with live inserts

THURSDAY at 9.30pm Flashback episode (30’) with live inserts

FRIDAY 20th FEBRUARY at 8pm: EastEnders fully live episode (30’)

Holly Crap 90 Minutes EE on Thursday the 19th

Ill be boiling the kettle a few times so