Wanderer2010 wrote: » Now im worried he is not streetwise and will just get himself killed and I really love this cat, so are there any tips on how to approach this common problem?? Any advice welcome.
VonVix wrote: » My boyfriend has had many cats through his life, probably four of them died by a car, and they were the wanderers. The cats he has now do go outside but they never cross the road or go any further than one or two houses down and they are surviving fine.
The Masculinist wrote: » You may also wish to consider a product in the link below.http://www.freedom-fence.co.uk/ Hope it goes well, sounds like a nice cat.
Nody wrote: » No, just no. It has been shown over and over again that any type of punishing style necklaces (as this is) does not work, full stop. If they get scared/interested enough they WILL go through it and simply not return and / or have more or less complete breakdowns over going out due to the pain they inflicted earlier.
The Masculinist wrote: » Why are people getting pets just to keep them indoors all day? Surely this is not natural for an animal? I live in the countryside and have ample space for my animals to roam free. I know this is a luxury not everyone has, but surely if you really cared for your animals you would either give them adequate outdoor space or not get them in the first place? I think it is selfish.
VonVix wrote: » It's not fair to say it's selfish. You don't know the circumstances where people have to or choose to keep their cat(s) in, there's loads of reasons, blindness, deafness, FIV, other health issues, extreme roaming, if a cat has a natural affinity for putting themselves in danger. A friend of mine keeps her cat strictly inside (she lives next to a main road), she recently got a kitten and is doing the same with him too. When she moves out in a few months she is building an outdoor space for them to go in and out of the house whenever they choose, but it'll prevent them from roaming or getting into danger.
The Masculinist wrote: » If you don't have adequate space to raise an animal then you are being selfish by keeping one.
The Masculinist wrote: » If you don't have adequate space to raise an animal then you are being selfish by keeping one. For the sake of animal welfare pets need adequate space. In most cases this includes the possibility of outdoor roaming. You have listed valid reasons for keeping a cat indoors, however, the average cat needs plenty of outdoor time in my opinion. I have to say, as a countryside dweller I do have the luxury of plenty of space and I can understand why someone with less space may disagree with me. I'm not trying to be argumentative, I just think that there are too many people who keep cats cooked up in small spaces and it is not fair on the animal.
The Masculinist wrote: » It's worked for my two cats and two dogs. Kept them alive over the past 5 years and they are always allowed to roam free.
boomerang wrote: » I think it's a misconception that cats roam and wander... They generally patrol the extent of their territory, and that's it. For a neutered, female housecat, that territory can be as small as your back garden and perhaps the next house on either side. That said, it is still dangerous and having only had dogs up to now during my adult life, I just can't conceive of letting my cats off by themselves - they're no more savvy. My guys have an enclosure and I take them out on harnesses. I still think fresh air and sunshine are beneficial, and they like to eat some fresh grass.
Tranceypoo wrote: » Your dogs shouldn't be allowed to 'roam free' it's against the law, they are supposed to be 'under your control' at all times!
aonb wrote: » After spending most of her life as an indoor cat, is there any possibility that she will go outside for a little wander around the property, then tootle back inside, or are ALL cats inclined to wander/roam?!?!
aonb wrote: » people seem to consider dogs to be more of a responsibility/serious pet/consideration because they are so people dependent maybe , whereas cats are seen as independent/self sufficient animals, which seems to make them "lesser" pets if you again understand what Im trying to convey.
aonb wrote: » As you know I am not a cat person - Tux is my first ever cat. Why are cats sort of considered to be a sort of 'disposable' pet in comparison with dogs. Do you know what I mean?? people seem to consider dogs to be more of a responsibility/serious pet/consideration because they are so people dependent maybe , whereas cats are seen as independent/self sufficient animals, which seems to make them "lesser" pets if you again understand what Im trying to convey. I know before I loved Tux so much, I would have said, if we go away we will leave a shed door open for her, and leave a bed and food there for her, whereas I would NEVER have been so casual about one of our dogs. Now that we are Tux-slaves, we will have to have a serious rethink. My husband thinks she should be allowed outdoors when neutered and vaccinated, I am rethinking that policy after this thread I have to think about keeping her contained safely while outdoors - with a leash/harness/slip-rope on a line/something. But if she cant roam/wander is there any point in letting her out at all...
Irish Stones wrote: » There's not a general rule, but you should keep in mind that cats are explorer, their nature says them to do so. More, you Tux comes from a feral family, sometimes the instinct of wandering and get back to nature can be still alive, passed on her by her mum someway. My elder cat was kept indoors, then we thought it could have been good for her to have a short walk every evening around (our) dinner time. She always stayed out 20-30 minutes, then she would come back and sleep. After some weeks, day after day, her walk time became longer, 30 min, 35 min, 45 min... 1 hour... until one night I had to look for her past midnight! From that night on she was never let out again without strict control, and eventually with harness and flexy lead. So my tip is not to trust her "home habit" blindly, you never know what her mind says her to do