calanus wrote: » He's only 9 and this is his third suspension..... Must be a cheeky little git anyway at the best of times.
The Peanut wrote: » I could have stopped reading after Texas.
Duckworth_Luas wrote: » I think I passed through Kermit, Texas once but my recollection is a bit fozzie!
The Backwards Man wrote: » There must be muppets running Kermit Elementary School
hatrickpatrick wrote: » Can't read the article now but I'm assuming this happened in the United States, right? Where they suspend kids for making fake guns out of fingers and drug them up for not behaving like dull adults?
The Backwards Man wrote: » Our talents are wasted here Duckie, these kids have probably never even heard of Waldorf and Statler.
Little CuChulainn wrote: » Suspension number one - referring to a black person as "black" Suspension number two - Bringing to school a book containing an illustration of a pregnant woman Suspension three - Offering to make his friend invisible. I'd be taking my kid out of that school pretty sharpish. It's obviously run by lunatics.
Nim wrote: » Who wouldn't want to be invisible? :eek:
Ficheall wrote: » That is the only thing I learned in Economics in college, so I have to use it when I can, so forgive me.
Little CuChulainn wrote: » /snip
valoren wrote: » If he does the "rat-at-at-at-at-at" machine gun sound, will he be suspended for assault with a deadly weapon?
One eyed Jack wrote: » It's the parents are at fault here, not the school. The parents get the same student handbook as all the other students, and yet this one child seems to be such a "trouble maker". We're missing context here, so I wouldn't be too quick to jump to conclusions about why the school chose to suspend the child.
Little CuChulainn wrote: » A 98 page rule book for a kid to follow?