irishbucsfan wrote: » Chrome has malloc issues but didn't I go and write extensions for it that I use constantly in work... I'll put up with it for now and hope someone in Google who understands the unix philosophy is put in charge of the project. Luckily on Linux (Ubuntu/Mint) it's not as big of an issue. Firefox is very good, and very well supported. Opera is like dating a hipster, it's fun and interesting until you have to actually rely on it for anything of substance.
dregin wrote: » Yeah, I've written extensions for it in the past because Firefox' extension dev experience was ****ing horrible. That was donkeys back, though, so things have hopefully improved on that front. Is chrome still 32bit on most platforms??
thomond2006 wrote: » English?
awec wrote: » I have a high dpi touch screen and I'm running Win 10 tech preview and Chrome is a disaster on it. It keeps getting "sticky" touches, like I'll touch the screen but Chrome won't realise I've lifted my finger off, so it thinks I'm constantly touching the screen in 1 place. Which of course means if I touch it anywhere else to scroll it thinks I have two fingers touching it and it zooms. It also makes the cursor disappear all the time and have to kill the process to close it.
dregin wrote: » In fairness to chrome, is this a build specifically for Windows 10 on touch screens or is it MS and their "new" notion that write once, run everywhere is totes doable? /me waves two fingers at Sun Microsystems
Deleted User wrote: » Don't forget to tune into RTE 2 at 10pm for the first part of six of Conor McGregor's documentary... I may or may not have an invested interest in it :pac:
mfceiling wrote: » Have you tried turning it off and back on again...
mfceiling wrote: » I'm guessing that most of you hip city boys aren't watching "A Rare Breed" a farming year on utv now. Silence in this house, as little eyes are wide open as to how the meat gets to the butchers or the potatoes get from the ground to the shop!!
awec wrote: » I need subtitles. I'm from Armagh and I don't even understand those two Armagh yokes talking about ploughing.
Zzippy wrote: » So we've been going through the legal process involved in buying a house - contracts almost signed. Perfect house, outskirts of town, convenient for work, local schools etc. Quiet road, lovely view, great price. Best place we looked at by a long shot. Today we find out that the consultation process for a new outer bypass starts this week and they've published a draft plan with 5 alternate routes. The 2 most likely go within 25m of the house, so it would either be a CPO or have a dual carriageway out your back garden.... FML
Deleted User wrote: » Ah jeez man that's awful, your head must be wrecked. Are you going to walk away?
errlloyd wrote: » I think Brent Pope just nodded at me while driving past on vespa. The ****
mfceiling wrote: » That is why my uncle who is a solicitor justifies his fees!! Sh*tty break tbh - would there be a huge amount of traffic on the carriageway?
Zzippy wrote: » Yeah I'd say it would be pretty busy alright. Hoping the other option is the one the engineers really want...
RuggieBear wrote: » erm...my job is designing those types of roads. a little cog in the machine PM me if you like
errlloyd wrote: » This is how things get done in Ireland. Few pms on boards, and RuggieBear will run that road right through some national historic monument instead.
RuggieBear wrote: » Ha! Don't work in Ireland anymore...but tbh people are about the lowest priority (most of the time) versus environmentally and culturally designated constraints.