fuzzydunlop85 wrote: » Did I see somewhere the fight is on tv3 tonight? And also, I seen a documentary advertised on rte is it a new one or is it just a repeat of the old one?
MrStuffins wrote: » This is one of the problems with bandwagoners.
walshb wrote: » Just to be clear, I haven't jumped on any bandwagon. I have the same interest in UFC as always. Follow it at times, but not intensely!
MrStuffins wrote: » Apologies for any offense caused. But I really meant was anyone who is a very casual fan or who dips in and out. It's easy to see that anyone who will only tune into the odd fight but will get sucked in by McGregor might fall for the hype. Conor was saying he was the best int he world long before he had actually proved it to anybody. He's taken all the right steps so far to back up what he's been saying.
walshb wrote: » No offense taken. I sort of knew that you probably didn't mean me directly. I just wanted to clear up any possible confusion. Point: I don't think someone has to be all that tuned in and all that interested in UFC to make a decent input or an informed and decent point about a fight and its combatants. Same as regards boxing or other disciplines. If someone sees something, for example that looks sussy or suspect, (weak opposition or an opponent clearly out of his depth) then they may be onto something. They may be wrong, but to label them as bandwagoners or misinformed may be a bit premature. I am not sold on the hype yet. And there is some level of hype. Conor's fights that I have seen recently didn't excite me or make me really sit up. He may impress me in the future, and I hope he does, but I am waiting a bit until I start dishing out a certain level of adulation and praise.
Nicolas Cage wrote: » The only two people to beat him were Joseph Duffy and Artemij Sitenkov. Both have the letter "J" in their first names, as does Jose Aldo. Therefore, Jose will beat him, most likely by first round submission of some sorts. You heard it here first.
T-K-O wrote: » Who does impress you in MMA?
chopperbyrne wrote: » I'm of the same opinion. I think stylistically Aldo is a better match for Conor than Frankie. Either way, Frankie is next in line after Conor and I think right now he'll beat either Jose or Conor.
Beersmith wrote: » The maynard fight was a division up though.
walshb wrote: » Aldo's intensity/power/speed impresses me. BTW, Conor is impressive. I was more meaning that the last few fights seemed rather tame. Looked like complete mismatches.
T-K-O wrote: » Siver was defiantly a tune up but apart from that his progession has been good, Brimage,halloway,brandao,poirier. Personally I haven't seen enough of Conor to pick him over Aldo and Edgar in saying that the manner in which he dispatched the above fighters is very impressive.
yourdeadwright wrote: » Almost like the old street fighter gamesi see the Division in 4 teirs , The Champ, the guys with a shot to beat him ,the gate keepers to the top and then the rest, To me Conor has just pasted the gatekeeper stage and done so beating Dustin so easy and the Siver fight proved nothing , Id love to see him aginst one of the next 3 before he fought Aldo , King =Aldo then=Mendes,Frankie,Lamas, limbo=Conor Gater keepers = ZOmbie,Swanson ,Dustin
Funk It wrote: » A lot of mixed reviews of Conor as a fighter and person over the last while, so I want to throw my 2 cents into the mix: He is living up to his hype and now has a shot at the title, I'm sure he will think of it as a massive failure if he doesn't win it this time around, but has a good a chance as anyone else in that division to make it happen. On the personals, a lot of folk are complaining on how he carries himself in interviews. He has brought a buzz into the division, and excitement into Ireland over the sport. Some people are whining about Pendred in the thread from the last fight, but Conor did say early days that he was going bringing more Irish into the UFC with him, and that can't be doubted. I think it's brilliant to see Paddy Hollihan involved with the UFC, and comes across as a gent, but I don't think Paddy would be where he is today (I could be wrong here), if it wasn't for Conor. As well as bigging himself up, Conor did the same for his other teammates as well which I think he deserves credit for.
CM24 wrote: » I think sometimes when someone clearly special comes along, it makes sense to hand them a title shot earlier than usual. Look at Jones when he fought Shogun. His best win was against Ryan Bader. Brock Lesnar's sole UFC win was against Heath Herring. Anderson Silva's sole UFC win was against Chris Leben. All of these guys went on to win the belts and defend them. Added to that, the fact that all the other main contenders have already lost to Aldo means Conor should get the shot. There have been many more undeserving shots throughout UFC history. Conor's personality just causes a lot of people to spite him.
xtal191 wrote: » I dont agree that the others wouldn't have made it to the UFC without Conor especially Paddy. Also Gunni was in the UFC before Conor and if anyone is deserving of the credit its Kavanagh.