emanresu esrever wrote: » Yeah, she was very much too emotionally involved to construct her argument in a better manner. This is the thing, people like Breda are not emotionally attached to the issue so they can maintain their calm in debate so seemingly remain "dignified" in their backwards views
eviltwin wrote: » You can call it a lot of things depending on the nature of it but if your talking marriage then it's a marriage same as it will be for gay couples. It's no difference.
Un Croissant wrote: » Why is Keith here? Total bellend.
efb wrote: » Iona plant
FixdePitchmark wrote: » What do you call a union between a man and a woman ?
small town girl wrote: » She started off so well but lost her argument half way through
eviltwin wrote: » What are you on about? What flawed logic? What disrespect?
Roger_007 wrote: » Why does the Iona Institute get so much air time on RTE.........they are only a bunch of right-wing religious loonies.
FixdePitchmark wrote: » This is a folly by the gay community Flawed logic and not respectful to the existing marriages in the country . Will be lost.
emanresu esrever wrote: » she has him in the cult also, he is an IONA bigot. shows you how much she pushes her opinions on others that her son happens to share the exact same opinion. Check out his articles. He is just as bad
Duddy wrote: » A lot of people were taken aback I think, but if Britney's Vegas marriage doesn't represent straight marriages then Stephen's shouldn't represent gay ones!
Roger_007 wrote: » Breda's SON!.............WTF?