Atlantic Dawn wrote: » The homo card played, it's going to be another cash payout me thinks.
FixdePitchmark wrote: » But - what do you call a union between a man and a women now. A bit daft - in fact, flawed logic to look for a marriage. Of course, a bill of additional equal rights would have been passed within the term civil partnership. But, telling people in a marriage , that they are not now in a marriage - is not going to be passed. Daft and confused logic. Missed opportunity.
eviltwin wrote: » I take it you are straight. Would you settle for a civil partnership?
emanresu esrever wrote: » any thoughts on Stephen Fry's marriage to a guy 30 years younger. I like the guy but I would say it if he married a girl that age, it took me back a bit.
Un Croissant wrote: » What if I don't want kids?! ****.
Wellyd wrote: » In the irish legal definition of marriage does it specifically say that marriage is between a man and a woman?
FixdePitchmark wrote: » I haven't followed this debate - but it looks like the question going to the public is confused. Why are gay people trying to be married - they can already have a civil partnership ? I'm confused - I can see this being rejected.
super_furry wrote: » You can bet that Iona would be screaming and whinging about bias if a pro-marriage equality spokesperson was solely selected to speak about how things have gone in Britain.
hotmail.com wrote: » Hmmmm I'm not so sure. Don't adoptive parents usually go through years of hardship/financial expense to eventually adopt a child.
gregers85 wrote: » And Finally our 10 points goes to......
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » Not if they are a multi-millionaire entertainer.