Meathlass wrote: » While I wouldn't have sent an invoice I can understanding the parents frustration. They booked a venue and activities for the numbers who confirmed attendance and were out of pocket as a result of no-shows. Why didn't Alex Nash's parents have the decency to ring and say he couldn't make it?
SpaceTime wrote: » Good luck with that : there's no contract, agreement or anything else so she's no business sending anyone an invoice. Also, taking a 5 year old to small claims !!!?? Emm.. I'm not sure where to start with how stupid that is.
Kolido wrote: » Out of curiosity, how could the woman who sent the invoice win a court claim on this? What legal rights does she have? Bizarre story btw :pac:
grundie wrote: » The fact that the parents had the means to generate a professional looking invoice makes me think that they are professional consultants of some kind...
grundie wrote: » The fact that the parents had the means to generate a professional looking invoice makes me think that they are professional consultants of some kind and are quite used to billing people for their time. I feel bad for their child who might grow up thinking that time is money and they can charge for friendship.
Leinsterblue wrote: » In Torpoint UK a 5 year old has been sent an invoice for failing to show up to another childs party, and leaving the other childs parents out of pocket to the tune of £16 the other side will go to the smalls claims court if unpaid.... silly people be silly.... no sleepovers allowed in that house.....
eviltimeban wrote: » I still don't understand how she's "out of pocket". If the child was there or not, it wouldn't make any difference right? Its not like the child was bringing the 16 quid to the party and she had to cover for him.
LexieOnRale wrote: » The other crowd are just as embarrassing, going to the tabloids posing for photos with the kid holding the invoice looking all forlorn. Set of simpletons
old_aussie wrote: » These first world problems will destroy the nation. Won't somebody think of the children.
SpaceTime wrote: » If anything, she actually saved money - the kid didn't eat her food, didn't mess up her house etc.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » 16 sterling a head :eek:
they realised their son was double-booked
Buford T. Justice V wrote: » I hope for the childs sake that there is somewhere that he can go to rent out friends because his parents are making sure that any of the kids he knows now will stay a million miles away from him.
Grayson wrote: » Poor kid. This story will follow him through school. His parents are idiots.