PirateShampoo wrote: » Never felt like that much of a loser to feel the need to.
neil_ wrote: » It's 2015, I think we can move past the idea that reading books is for losers
The Backwards Man wrote: » I haven't, but I predict there will be a lot of Jan 15 regs along presently who have.
razorblunt wrote: » I lost. Well played OP.
porsche959 wrote: » Isn't it a handbook for sociopaths?
Desolation Of Smug wrote: » I preferred his brother Levi. He's got the good genes.
Sky King wrote: » Why does this post not have more thanks?
catallus wrote: » What's the book about?
Sugar Free wrote: » I actually thought it was an entertaining read in terms of the story but didn't take much stock from the PUA theory.
BBDBB wrote: » Its all about dat base, bout dat base. no trouble
tomwaterford wrote: » I've often heard of this book (mainly on here)...what actually is it about?? Would like to know from someone who actually read it Im not for promoteing/dismissing it or anything....just pure curious Is it actually a story to it or is it like a diy book
Dean0088 wrote: » If you find yourself actually considering reading book dedicated to manipulating a small sub-set of damaged women for the purposes of getting laid, then you're probably a loser.
Sugar Free wrote: » Journalist for Rolling Stone does a piece on 'seduction' artists. Ends up becoming good friends with some of them and is heavily involved in the scene. Is widely regarded as one of the top PUA's. Group of them rent out a big house and run paid courses for guys on how to be better with women. Realises that although the stuff he learned helped him immensely to develop as a person, the nature of what they learn can screw up other guys views on things. It's been about ten years since I read so that's my best recollection.