viking861 wrote: » Hi... just wondering if anyone can give me advice on this..i want to apply to the firestation but im worried ill get refused due to getting put off the road for drink driving 10 years ago...am i 100% doomed to fail?
Tintin8 wrote: » Quick answer!!!!! NO! If it's been 10 years and your record is clean since then u may be ok. Unless you've a conviction still? In that case it may be difficult. I would apply anyway
viking861 wrote: » Thanks....no thats the only thing i ever had happen. I just dont wont to be wasting my time ya know
WhiteWalls wrote: » would a retained fire fighter be similar to the garda reserve?
civdef wrote: » Retained firefighters are providing 24/7/365 frontline statutory fire cover across the majority of this country. They maintain extremely high standards of training and readiness and are equipped with equipment equivalent to the best available anywhere in the world. They do all this whilst balancing their own careers and family lives, often coming back from a hard call at night to face a full day's work in their other job. Their families have to deal with the fact that they can be called to an emergency at any time, often at inconvenient times. Even something as simple as going shopping needs to be planned for. The social welfare payment would only apply if they were unemployed. There is no way, shape or form in which retained firefighters are anything other than professional frontline emergency workers - any for my money they're one of the most under-appreciated groups in this country. For the record, I am not a retained firefighter saying this.
ryanf1 wrote: » Also when your retained you are not entitled to a pension on retirement at 57. You only get a cash lump sum but no income.
shamrock55 wrote: » If applying for retained position would it be a dissadvantage being unemployed?, as in would they prefer you to already have a job locally, in case that down the line you get a full time job maybe outside the 2 mile zone or a job that you might have to travel and you would no longer be suitable, or does it not matter in the slightest?
shamrock55 wrote: » Thanks for the replys lads, another thing is would it be a dissadvantage to not have a full c licence, i have a b, but not a c, is there anything else they would like an applicant to have?, i have cpr and defib course done and also a 3 day firefighter course done that included use of ba, i have a good standard of fitness also, the only thing that concerns me a bit is my age as im 38, could go against me?
Tintin8 wrote: » Well it's probably very little... How can it work if u only have 2 set hours a week that are guaranteed? At the moment ye get about a grand a years service. I got 4grand gratuity when I left after 4 years. Couldn't get a mortgage retained , money very unreliable . I also hated going on holiday coz u don't get paid for the calls u miss . So u may only get the dole for the 2 weeks
shamrock55 wrote: » Can i ask roughly how many call outs did your station get per year when you were retained
yourpics wrote: » Is there a minimum eyesight requirement??
Tintin8 wrote: » Yes you'll do a eyetest with your doctor before employment. 20/20 is what's needed
iceage wrote: » I think you'll find that 20/20 is not the case. Most Counties Medical guidelines state the below requirements which have been in place since about 2005. I personally know of two recruits from two separate Counties that wear glasses and were able to pass the eyesight requirements and go on to pass their Recruit training. "Visual Acuity – the minimum visual acuity of the fire fighter should normally be 6/18. This must in no case fall below 6/24 correctable to 6/9, 6/12 and any decision should be taken after consideration of the fire fighters operational ability and other aspects of visual function. Fire fighters may use spectacles of an appropriate specification on the fire ground should they be needed to obtain this standard of vision. Fire fighters should have a normal binocular visual field as determined by confrontational techniques. Near vision is only likely to become a problem with the hypermetropic entrant when the age of 40 or more has been reached. At this time unaided distance acuity should be as set out above. It is not thought necessary to routinely test near vision. The loss of normal accommodative power in the eye over the age of 40 should not prove a disqualification for operational fire fighting.