OSI wrote: » No, because when you return a broken item it's noted on the old receipt and a new one issued showing it was exchanged.
Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: » And well done to whoever wrote them. I'm sure they are very good at what they do. Same as the engineers who designed my new BMW 5 Series. But I don't need to know the intricate details of how they work.
Dark Phoenix wrote: » I have a lovely colleague who has the irritating habit of asking questions that she could easily find the answer to if she looked up online.
Electric Sheep wrote: » Taught my staff at my old job to reply to such queries with "Shall I Google that for you?" Shamed them out of stupid questions after a while...
OSI wrote: » Yes yes. You walk into the store with your plain white scanned and reprinted receipt and expect them not to notice the complete lack of the store branding in full colour that's printed on the reverse side. Or that when they scan the transaction barcode on the receipt to bring it up on the till it doesn't match what's printed on the receipt. Brilliant!
Your Superior wrote: » A 5 Series BMW, the company's way of saying you're a bit better than a Passat level employee (i.e. low level mediocrity) but only by a tiny amount. Well done...
Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: » What car does your company provide you, Your Superior? A 1986 Ford Orion?...
Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: » What car does your company provide you, Your Superior? A 1986 Ford Orion? If a BMW 5 Series and a Passat are for low-level drones, then what car would they buy for those higher up the corporate ladder?
Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: » What car does your company provide you, Your Superior? A 1986 Ford Orion? If a BMW 5 Series and a Passat are for low-level drones, then what car would they buy for those higher up the corporate ladder? I bought the car myself. It's a lovely drive and worth every penny. Premium German engineering. And when I do get it serviced, it will be in a garage where professionalism, courtesy and knowledge are always shown.
Your Superior wrote: » It's my own company so I have whatever car I choose. I chose a Tesla. The directors in my company drive Jaguar XJs or a 7 series BMW/Audi A7 as a rule, management have a budget of £35k and can choose what they want, other staff get £28k to use.
somesoldiers wrote: » I have noticed the word "ping" creeping into work conversations in my office. "I'll ping him an email", "I will ping that over to you". I must confess I cringe and feel a little bit of vomit build up every time someone uses it. Can any IT types confirm whether "ping" should now replace send, ring, call, forward, etc and other verbs used in offices settings?
LenaClaire wrote: » No, it should not. IT has spoken.
somesoldiers wrote: » Can any IT types confirm whether "ping" should now replace send, ring, call, forward, etc and other verbs used in offices settings?
anncoates wrote: » Don't start the neckbeards off again. They're already hit agitation level 5 (Programming Language Put-Down). :pac:
anncoates wrote: » So, what's the collective noun for a group of outraged IT workers? :pac:
bucketybuck wrote: » This thread was a lot more interesting when it was about stupid requests at work rather than a parade of people responding to an obvious wind up.
Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: » I can't get over this rage all the IT drones here are expressing at the fact that the "higher-ups" of their company don't know the ins and outs of their software systems. Of course they don't! If they did then they wouldn't bother paying you to sort out that stuff. Just to pre-empt the shrill cries of "You think they'd at least learn the basics!!". It's a complete waste of time. If I have a problem printing off a document, or connecting to the internet, then its a complete waste for my firm to have me crawling around on all fours pulling wires in and out of a computer. I get paid to do a job that very few other people can do and thus am remunerated accordingly. It would cost the company a fortune to have me sorting out trivial IT problems. It's much more efficient to call one of the scruffy lads from 'the dungeon' to come up and sort it out whilst I get on with more pressing issues.
jimgoose wrote: » Absolutely not. "Ping" refers to an ICMP Echo-Request, and is used to verify that whatever/whoever is supposed to be at the other end is indeed at the other end and able to respond. It has its uses between people, but none of the above are them. Unless the purpose is to make sure the other person is present and alive.