"Suggestion of impropriety with minors untrue," says Buckingham Palace after Prince Andrew named in US sex lawsuit
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30659629
this is surprising if it's true
bnt wrote: » I have no idea why this story has popped up again, the allegations date back to 2011 e.g. this article in Vanity Fair.
Venus In Furs wrote: » Think that was just mentioned though because there's the misguided notion that he was a virginal young lad.
padd b1975 wrote: » Young heterosexual male in sewing wild oats shocker!!
weldoninhio wrote: » In fairness, I doubt very much that Harry has any Windsor blood in him. Spencer and Hewitt.
Losty Dublin wrote: » An unnamed son of an UK based Queen has been linked to a kiddy fiddler. Is that better?
giles lynchwood wrote: » Before he married ginger minge, the media gave him the nickname" Randy Andy" because of his string of casual flings including soft porn actress Koo Shark.
the_monkey wrote: » Would be surprised if it wasn't true to be honest. All the UK Royal family are up to all sorts of sick twisted sh/it
keeponhurling wrote: » To be honest, stuff like this should keep all the names anonymous until something is proven
Sala wrote: » Seems to be a lot of cases of high profile/wealthy men involved in abuse scandals these days.
Billy86 wrote: » I would say Harry to be honest, once he got over his teenage phase with things like the Nazi Halloween costume he has gone on to be easily the best walking, talking PR machine for the royals since his mom died. As for Andrew I guess I wouldn't be shocked if it is true, but as people have said this trial by media/guilty until proven innocent nonsense is nothing short of a blight on modern society.
Hitchens wrote: » Andy seemed to be the most normal of the royals
keeponhurling wrote: » that daily mail article seems to name the 17-year old
Son0vagun wrote: » Jill Dandos death, Cliff Richard, Jimmy Saville, Roff Harris, Royal Paedo Ring are all connected! I'm guessing
RobertKK wrote: » Guilty until proven innocent, trial by media...
porsche959 wrote: » Would have thought he has a reputation as a complete boor.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1361637/Why-did-rude-Prince-Andrew-trade-role-asks-ex-envoy.html Doesn't necessarily mean he is guilty of anything in this case of course.
Fratton Fred wrote: » I'm not a big fan of Man United. I'd stop short of saying they're doing sick twisted **** though.
ceadaoin. wrote: » They have sovereign immunity and can't be prosecuted for a crime
the_monkey wrote: » Im just not a big fan of the royal family..
AndonHandon wrote: » "The woman, who filed the motion anonymously"http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/uk/prince-andrew-named-in-us-underage-sex-lawsuit-1.2053049 How the **** can she file such an application anonymously yet the alleged perpetrators can be named and reported? That is ludicrous.
Harry Palmr wrote: » 17? Fer petes sake. If that's a crime I'm a peccadillo