thestar wrote: » In comparison to coal there is a lot less heat out of it, doesn't last near as long and when labor, storage and transportation are taken into account I don't think it is cheap at all. What's the big fascination with it?
mad muffin wrote: » I pity the fools who have to shovel solid fuel in to their stoves every day. I much prefer to fick a switch or set it on timer to come on before I wake up. :pac:
muslimstudent wrote: » Me too but the wife prefers the ambiance that a fireplace creates.
Sheep Lover wrote: » Because turf grows in the bog beside me, coal doesn't
thestar wrote: » What's the big fascination with it?
heldel00 wrote: » Because it cost us 250 euro and will fill our fire for the whole year with some left over for next year. ( I wasn't near a bog until I moved in with my husband two years ago. We always just had sticks. Oh god I miss sticks )
Tin Foil Hat wrote: » Open fires are stupid yokes that make your house cold.
WhiteWalls wrote: » 250euro of turf would not be enough for a year
kneemos wrote: » You must be delighted to have some of last years turf left over?
heldel00 wrote: » Yes it is if our neighbour owns the bog
muslimstudent wrote: » Stoves are more efficient than open fires.
jive_bunny wrote: » i have a bog but i pay 50 euro per hopper to get it cut , add in about thirty hours work to turn , foot etc and its an incredibly time consuming exercise