B_Wayne wrote: » Every single mainstream party are in favour of same sex marriage...... Plus the only argument you have provided so far is that people will want to marry animals which is a pretty rubbish argument.
thaidad wrote: » Your pro baby murder too?
The Masculinist wrote: » Responses with emotive terminology are generally less mature in my view.
RayM wrote: » I suspect a lot of those who would be inclined not to vote yes won't bother either. Very, very few people are actively opposed to it.
david75 wrote: » If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal this attitude and apathy in general, is the one big opposition we face. The naysayers are a dying breed...thankfully. lets not be complacent..lets drag Ireland forward
marienbad wrote: » But it is more mature to vote no to spite those responses ? are you serious ?
david75 wrote: » Im too busy laughing at this to reply properly. And even after all that Fran, you still havent constructed a single sentence detailing why i should be lesser than you in the eyes of the state or its laws.. and clearly i was joking and thats kinda the worst humour youll hear, laden with and information also. Ive yet to see you give us a single fact..only an uninformed opinion..
Willfarman wrote: » Well only the Irish Catholic church lad! But who are they! So who are numerous..the religous nuts or the gays and supporters?
The Masculinist wrote: » Lisbon also had many important implications for the country but people still voted no in protest. People protest in different ways.
marienbad wrote: » So you would deny a Civil Right you agree with because of the quality of some of the supporters ?
The Masculinist wrote: » Excellent point. Don't forget that a referendum will only be called at the Government's discretion. And don't forget that gay marriage is being used as a political tool to buy votes in my view! But definitely, apathy is far too high, people need to take a much more active interest in politics.
VinLieger wrote: » People voted no to lisbon in protest of the treaty being ridiculous impossible to understand beareucratic gobbledegook. Hardly the same as what you are doing.
thaidad wrote: » Why won't some gay men bottom are they secretly straight but too ugly to get a women? I mean if it's so good why are there gay men that will top only.
thaidad wrote: » What's next for progess, multi wifes, no species marriage, furries getting to not be human but the species of their choice?
thaidad wrote: » Not animals trans species otherkin. They where born a man but are really a fox dragon. They deserve happiness too as their trueselves
thaidad wrote: » That's his right
Kiwi in IE wrote: » Every person I know who calls themselves Catholic and whom I know well enough to discuss such things, bar one, do not like what the church has to say on any sexual or personal relationship issues and simply leave that out of their beliefs.
endacl wrote: » What is it about this topic that prompts people to register an account simply to post arseology and nonsense?
RayM wrote: » I think most Catholics - even those who don't actively support marriage equality - are decent enough not to actively oppose it. There just aren't enough die-hard extremists out there to defeat this referendum.
thaidad wrote: » I registered my account to talk about a **** mother on parenting actually get your facts rights
endacl wrote: » Just generally abusive then?
RayM wrote: » 119 pages, and not one valid argument against marriage equality.
Willfarman wrote: » Will be interesting to see. We seen a young woman die in a public hospital not too long ago because of these gob****es.
The Masculinist wrote: » As I posted previously, can you tell me why you believe that gay marriage is a (civil) right? What are you basing this on? The UN charter of human rights? What is your basis? I am not saying gay marriage is not a right, I was just unaware. I am open to persuasion!
