golfball37 wrote: » Its at odds with nature for same sex couples to make love imo. Call me what you want but thats my opinion.
1123heavy wrote: » Endacl if you're trying to suggest i'm someone who goes and screams off the top of my voice in public you are sorrily mistaken, rather you reminded me of the type that do so i suggested it as a viable option for you.
Nomis21 wrote: » If it would be promoted as "Anti-Religion" I think there would be an even larger "Yes" vote
golfball37 wrote: » I personally don't believe the sexual act between SSC's is natural. Nothing to do with God. Man and woman were created so they could procreate by sharing themselves. Its at odds with nature for same sex couples to make love imo. Call me what you want but thats my opinion.
Baldy Conscience wrote: » Voting Yes, of course. Only imbeciles aren't voting, or voting no. there is actually not a single valid reason for voting no on this issue, or not voting at all. "It doesn't affect me" is not a valid reason.
Flem31 wrote: » So if I vote no that would make me a bad person.......not a great fan of water charges so have the unreasonable label also. I wonder how many negative labels I could accumulate by the end of December. Re Yes or No.......it is an individual's choice and labelling one side or the other doesn't help matters
1123heavy wrote: » Anonoboy- Thank you for your concern. I am perfectly capable of quoting, I have this high tech device called a laptop that enables me to move a mouse and click on all sorts of things, however I use it as I will and do not always use all functions available. I wasn't aware I had to answer to you about such small issues.
Zemuppet wrote: » The main 'issue' some have over gay couples adopting or having kids is that they would be bullied because of it. Tbh kids get bullied for a lot less i.e weight, glasses, intelligence, etc and this is before you could include race, religion or ethnic status. I don't think anyone can give a proper reason as to why SSCs couples can't marry.
c_man wrote: » Oh for gods sake. It's exactly this type of attitude that pisses me, and lots of others, off and I'm on the same side as you! Name calling and dismissing any argument against yours, yeah democracy is great... If I'm in Ireland at the time, I'll vote in favour of it. But tbh, I don't think it's that big of an issue. Plenty more pressing things to be sorted imo but fair play to the community for getting this into the mainstream after years of campaigning, and one thing at a time I suppose.
c_man wrote: » If I'm in Ireland at the time, I'll vote in favour of it. But tbh, I don't think it's that big of an issue. Plenty more pressing things to be sorted imo but fair play to the community for getting this into the mainstream after years of campaigning, and one thing at a time I suppose.
kylith wrote: » Why you're bringing up the water charges I have no idea. Is someone trying to get a licence to marry their meter?
Manach wrote: » I'll be voting No. Both in defence of the traditional norms of marriage and to show there are some cultural legacies that cannot be changed, especially if this spikes this government moves to appease the PC brigade.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » I think it is in May.I won't because it does not affect me. If they get it passed fair play but I doubt i'm in a minority when I say I have little interest in it. I think this apathy might be the biggest risk to the referendum and also the appeal of giving the government a harmless (in my view) kicking. Anyone feel the same way about it? I just could not be bothered. I think it will be like the children's referendum. Very low turnout.
c_man wrote: » Oh for gods sake. It's exactly this type of attitude that pisses me, and lots of others, off and I'm on the same side as you! Name calling and dismissing any argument against yours, yeah democracy is great...
elefant wrote: » I used to think like this in my early teenage years. For shame.
fran17 wrote: » I will be voting and it will be a no.I'm sick and tired of the Catholic Church bashing and this is just more of the same.Homosexuals already have a union thats recognised legally,marriage is a religious ceremony.They have an extreme intolerance for religion,which is very clearly visible here by the postings of the pro gay union people,but want a religious ceremony!Make up your minds.
fran17 wrote: » marriage is a religious ceremony.