Murph_D wrote: » I think I remember that bush! Great racing, savage PB, nice report. Good to meet you after.
yaboya1 wrote: » I think AMK, Gavlor & belcarra all followed the BAA plan for their Spring Marathons this year, so maybe ask them what they thought. I'm sure there's a few more who've followed it too, but I can't think of any off hand. I think if you pb'd off a haphazard version of the 12/55 plan, following the 18/70 plan would make you a certainty to run a significant pb again, especially considering the base building you've been doing.
Bahanaman wrote: » I followed the BAA plan for Waterford this year. Was in the best shape of my life. Things went well and I finished up injury free which is always a help! I'd recommend it.
adrian522 wrote: » Which one are you looking at? I did the BAA Intermediate plan, think I maxed out at 70 miles on that.
overpronator wrote: » Thanks for the heads up Bahanaman, I appreciate it. Ill have a read over your log for sure! I'm leaning towards the BAA plan at the minute I think. What would you say were the things your liked the most and didn't like about it and what kind of mileage did you top out at? Cheers again.
ThebitterLemon wrote: » Sunday 14.5 hrs 8.08 pace Over 14 hours at 8 min pace I'm impressed TbL
BeepBeep67 wrote: » Well done buddy, any more weddings after VLM and we'll plan that 10k assault!
Tom Joad wrote: » Great year OP. Some great progress especially over the half marathon. Will see you in Trim.
yaboya1 wrote: » Looks like a sub 3 bid is on the cards in London based off Saturday's effort