keithclancy wrote: » You can protest what you like, but don't expect people to understand your protest if you ally yourself with any tom dick and harry. Can you tell me what the protest on Wednesday is actually for, counting of course all the people that are turning up ?
ROCKMAN wrote: » According to the other thread there be at least 288 people expected on the streets tomorrow ,Do ye think your protest can match this figure?
DamagedTrax wrote: » i havent allied myself with anybody. there are no teams. im marching for myself because i strongly believe irish water has nothing to do with conservation or infrastructure repair. i believe it is a money spinner for FG and their buddies. designed to fail the people, while bolstering the 'ruling class'. i have no issue with a water charge, a fact ive spoken openly about in the other 2 threads. but not if IW is a part of it. thats why im protesting. is that ok with you, am i deemed an acceptable protestor? :rolleyes:
keithclancy wrote: » The point is the message is not clear, its just a bunch of pi$$ed off people that have different points of view. That is a mob, not a protest.
DamagedTrax wrote: » whatever you want to call it is fine, it doesnt change it. sure enda himself implied that we're all dangerous fringe elements... we laughed at him too
keithclancy wrote: » Fringe elements .. you guys do like your buzz words. Along with the new favorite "Quango" .. lol
DamagedTrax wrote: » enda's words, not ours. dont you remember?
keithclancy wrote: » That was Leo Varadkar along with Alan Kelly who agreed with him no ?
DamagedTrax wrote: » no, that was 'the sinister fringe'.
Then when ministers were subject to raucous protests in which eggs and water bombs were thrown and cars were rocked and blocked, it turned out that the big marches were exactly the right kind of protest and these smaller less polite protests were the wrong kind - the result of infiltration by sinister fringe elements and anarchists, communists and republicans.
keithclancy wrote: » Ah you mean: To make it easy to understand, he meant skangers.
DamagedTrax wrote: » im not even gonna waste more time with you.
DamagedTrax wrote: » 'the sinister fringe'.
hmmm wrote: » No filtration without taxation. Hell no we won't pay (for your water). I'll have my banners ready.
daveyeh wrote: » I'm starting up an anti anti water charges protest march for tomorrow. Meet at the Central Bank tomorrow, we'll show those smelly anti water oiks what's what. THERE'S NO WAY. YOU WON'T PAY. Who's with me?
renegademaster wrote: » if i had a euro for everytime i've heard this over the last 6 or 7 years i'd be living next door to denis o brien in malta!! :pac:
fryup wrote: » what do you reckon will the "rent a riot mob" be out in force tomorrow ?? SF and their boot boys
fryup wrote: » every extremists have their boot boys
Kalman wrote: » You don't have to have water! However,try doing without your tap-water for a week, nay, for a day! No shower/baths , no coffee/tea, no water for your washing machine and worst of all, no toilets, no nothing without water. Huh, I would willingly pay for mine.
HamsterFace wrote: » Probably isn't planned. I saw some socialist/lay litigant/eirigi /Feckin everything protest outside leinster house one day, only about 60 showed up to their own annoyance so they weren't really able to make an impact. So they all went up and sat on the quays at OConnell bridge for a few hours and blocked traffic for the evening. They were delighted to disrupt people somehow. Expect similar tomorrow but don't expect any real organisation.
