jd wrote: » In this context, pavement means the road service.
irishfeen wrote: » Another death and two others seriously injured this evening on the N20 between Buttevant and Mallow - heartbreaking for the family before Christmas ... you would wonder how many more have to die for the M20 to be funded
sonnyblack wrote: » Heard Sean o Neill of NRA on radio recently banging on about red cow opening and gort tuam starting as well as enniscorthy and new Ross bypasses starting next year. No mention of M20. Its an out and out disgrace. Has to be the most dangerous national route in the country. Its at least 5 if not 10 years off Imho
L1011 wrote: » That's what you get for voting in a lot of FF down there :pac:
veryangryman wrote: » Just looking at NRA traffic figures for existing N20https://www.nratrafficdata.ie/c2/gmapbasic.asp?sgid=ZvyVmXU8jBt9PJE$c7UXt6 11,000 through Charleville 15,000 through Buttevant Maybe this is why the road is so lowly prioritised? Compare with 20,000 north of Claregalway for instance. If i was a higher up who knew nothing about either area, Id be putting the money towards the most benefactors (as they have). Inter-Urbans need priority of course, but the numbers dont lie
Vanquished wrote: » By the same measure the AADT north of Crusheen on the M18 is only 9,000. At Barefield just north of Ennis it's 11,000. The reason for the lack of progress on the M20 is the cost of the project and the fact that planning of the scheme commenced pretty late in the day. The preferred route was only identified in 2009!If it has any hope of going ahead in the foreseeable future it needs to be split up in to smaller segments. The most pressing section is south of Croom to Mallow.
munchkin_utd wrote: » if they came up with the sensible idea of making that less busy section just a 2+2 then it'd be somewhat more affordable too.
AugustusMinimus wrote: » Let's just do the whole thing correctly from the start instead of going down the route of half arsed measures for saving pennies.
zulutango wrote: » You could also argue that so few are using the road because it is so bloody impassable. Personally, I avoid trips to Cork from Limerick as much as possible because the road is a nightmare. I'm sure there are many thousands of people in both cities who fall into this category. The justification for improving a road or building a motorway should never be based solely on the numbers using the existing road.
Missyelliot2 wrote: » I've never tried to get to Limerick via Mitchelstown- solely due to an abysmal sense of direction, but I hate the 'main' Cork-Limerick road- it is dangerous and horrible to drive. But, it seems as is getting from Cork to Belfast without a traffic light is the priority!
AugustusMinimus wrote: » Be interesting what the 2023 World Cup bid could do for this project. I have no doubt that the lack of motorway between the 3rd and 4th cities on the island could have a very negative effect on the bid. Potentially maybe for a fast build in the event of a bid win announcement in 2017. Worse that this though is the potentially for a half arsed rush job in the event of a bid win. I'm thinking an awful online dual carriageway build.
Jhcx wrote: » Would a dual carriageway way be bad? Presuming if it was a quick build they wouldn't be using the same tactic of building it to motorway standard and then just applying for an upgrade?