scudzilla wrote: » 100k people paying €60 a ticket or 50k people paying a MINIMUM of €70 with an average price of around 150. It'll smash any record, no doubt about it
Mellor wrote: » Not necessarily. They've had european title fights before. The alternative, is that it happens in Melbourne, McGregor is also been suggested for that event too. Sporting event probably. But not ANY event. There's been plenty of concerts with well over 100k people. Slane, Robbie Williams, Eminem. I doubt the UFC could catch up with those events. That's not including 2/3 day events obviously.
dulux99 wrote: » The other thing about a stadium show, would be what time of the day it would take place. If it's a 60k stadium show for a UFC title then it would have to be a numbered PPV, and the UFC will always cater for their American PPV market, because that's their big money spinner.
scudzilla wrote: » As for Gate Reciepts, it will smash ANY event EVER held in Ireland, no question
Stuxnet wrote: » So if it was Croker and 80K odd seated tickets sold, a) Pity the fools miles up at the back and top of the stadium b) Pity the fools seated miles from the octagon placed at the centre of the field ie. everybody..? b) Will the field surrounding the octagon be empty...space for 20 thousand fans...so now are we looking for 100k tickets..not a chance...aviva it is Bring it back to the O2, practically cageside I was the last event, it was graaaand ! Stadium would be cool, but I feel the fans might be placed to far from the action ?
MagicIRL wrote: » Keep your roll eyes to yourself.
Redditor wrote: » McGregor to take vow of silence. :rolleyes:
EuskalHerria wrote: » Even if the UFC are looking to book a stadium, there's nothing to say they have intentions of selling the full capacity. They can use 'sold out arena' as a tagline to inflate Conor, while for either stadium not opening the top tiers or altering the set up to reduce the capacity on the night. I guess we'll know on January 19th.
Saipanne wrote: » Valid points, maybe tv screens above the octagon might be needed.
Mellor wrote: » That's a pretty good suggestion. The same amount of fights put on, but promoted better. The Penultimate Fighting Championships
ASOT wrote: » Well if I was implementing it id keep the WEC events solely in the USA as it would make more business sense with the UFC brand obviously going to sell alot better outside the USA. Then with the fighters coming through the WEC in theory all cards would have been stronger.
Mellor wrote: » The idea if a feeder promotion makes a lot of sense on paper. But if it ends up being 1 PPV, 1 Fight Night, 1-2 WEC events per month, is there much difference? And, if UFC dublin had if been a WEC event, would it have been as memorable?
dave1982 wrote: » I think closing WEC was a mistake if UFC had planned on some many events, they should have opened up more divisions in the WEC get the so far "unknown" fighters some hype behind them, then maybe if there is a dominant champion in the WEC who defends the tile lets say 3 times he get automatic title shot at the Champion in their division in the UFC, Champion V Champion are huge fights, we had them with the merger of Pride and the UFC. If the kept WEC open and had less UFC PPV's there would be more excitement, the American paying $50 now for events must be pissed compared to what $50 got them few years back where any fight on the card could be a main event
MagicIRL wrote: » Is this now the casual MMA chat thread or what's the story? I'm so confused.
Cyber Ghost wrote: » Well I wouldn't blame the above poster regarding Pendred. He has to be one of the most boring fighters in all MMA
Well I wouldn't blame the above poster regarding Pendred. He has to be one of the most boring fighters in all MMA
csallmighty wrote: » I have no problem with it but I don't really like how some people gained an interest only in McGregor and don't bother with the rest of the Irish fighters or mma in general.
Mellor wrote: » July is always the busiest with Fight week. 6 events that month. But 45 for the year, which is less than 4 a month on average. I'd prefer 25-30 events per year personally but going back to 6 events per year like sone would suggest would stifle the sport massively. This sums up the irony of MMA fans. On one hand complaining about too many events, but on the other supporting McGregor and Irish fighters getting a chance. It's one or the other. An event every 2 months is about 72 fights per year. If fighters fight 2-3 times a year, that means there's room for 6-9 per division, and that's if they drop 115 women and 125 men. There be no room for up and coming fighters to prove themselves. So no McGregor, no Khabib, no VanZant :eek: Sure, sometimes the 2nd rate events aren't worth watching. But they are necessary to figure out how to build the stacked cards.