Rogue-Trooper wrote: » Staggering number of cyclists people on bikes early this morning with no lights. It's bad enough in the dark but with that fog thrown in they would just appear out of nowhere. Obviously some sort of 'natural selection' at work - Darwin must be twitching in his grave.
shaka wrote: » Seen one cyclist, sorry one commuter take out another on William st and at least 7 go up wrong way on a one way system one narrowly avoiding a head on with a Taxi- in my head I could imagine George Hook or Joeee Duffy bleeding on about bloody cyclists . Rant over
Beasty wrote: » I suspect some of these guys riding without lights really have little understanding of how vulnerable it makes them
Beasty wrote: » .. I suspect some of these guys riding without lights really have little understanding of how vulnerable it makes them
Mercian Pro wrote: » Made a point a few winters ago of politely telling some fellow cyclists that their lights weren't working or that they could do with a light. General reaction was ok with some blaming the batteries or saying that the light had been stolen at work. Not sure if it actually encouraged/embarrassed anyone into doing something about it. Was always carefull to do a quick risk assessment before saying anything!
Leroy42 wrote: » So, why bother making the gesture to him at all.
doozerie wrote: » I don't understand why so many people deal with obnoxious and dangerous road user behaviour by simply closing their eyes to it and hoping it'll go away.
doozerie wrote: » Plainly and simply, it was a moment of self-indulgent immaturity. It was not intended to achieve anything other than give me a fleeting feeling of satisfaction. Sometimes I want to understand why someone has done or said something, sometimes I simply don't care and just want them to get out of my face, this was the latter. It was only after his subsequent actions, and convenient circumstances (he was travelling my route) that I decided to make it the former. As to the general question of whether I, or anyone else, should take issue with another person about their actions on the road, that's an entirely personal thing but I feel very strongly that it's a positive thing to do. If it is done constructively, of course, which circumstances don't always allow/suit. My take on it is that by ignoring bad behaviour on the roads I am tacitly accepting it and deeming it somehow normal and therefore, by extension, socially acceptable. Driving and cycling standards in this country are woeful, at least those that I see regularly, and in my opinion that won't change unless there is social pressure to make it change. The rules of the road are routinely ignored by many people, the threat of being penalised seems to mean nothing to such people. The risk of public embarrassment, on the other hand, seems like a strong incentive for many to avoid doing something that will draw adverse attention to themselves. So I consider pointing out their actions to other road users as a viable approach to improving their behaviour in the future. Not for any altruistic reasons, by the way, I simply want to make the roads a safer environment for me and those that I care about, so my motives are entirely selfish. But that doesn't make them any less worthwhile to pursue. If even one driver or cyclist moderates their dick-ish behaviour as a result of being held to account for doing something stupid and/or dangerous, then that's a good result. So personally I think that dealing with road users' behaviour is important. Most people would probably say something to a person that jumped ahead of them in the queue in a shop, for example, they might even take action by calling the gardai if they saw someone stealing a bike or breaking into a house, I don't understand why so many people deal with obnoxious and dangerous road user behaviour by simply closing their eyes to it and hoping it'll go away. I can understand why people may be reluctant to directly communicate with a reckless motorist or cyclist, but ignoring the behaviour entirely is just wrong, in my view, nothing will change if we all adopt that approach. I don't seek out altercations, incidentally, that's a view that I encounter at times, some people seem to think I create situations as if I enjoy the aggro. I don't, I hate aggro, I also have no stomach for violence so I want to stay well away from it, but sometimes facing into that is a risk that I am willing to take if I think doing so can achieve something. And I have come away from some situations convinced that someone that had done something dangerous did so unknowingly or without thinking through the potential consequences and that they will truly be more careful in future, and that feels like having achieved something good. Maybe the direct result of my intervening is that my wife or my daughter won't be subjected to the same actions by the same person tomorrow, or next week - that's worth some calculated risk, as far as I am concerned. When all reason fails, I sometimes resort to reporting people to TrafficWatch, if more people did nothing more than us the TrafficWatch service then I think the roads would be a safer place for everyone.
galwaycyclist wrote: » This. We need to find a way to make it uncool to act in a threatening and obnoxious manner on a public road. It needs to become seen like picking your nose in public or scratching your crotch etc. The challenge is that the car lobby have a large influence over the media and political discourse and are able to set the agenda. They are able to make it ok to do bad things as long as nobody actually gets hurt.
Leroy42 wrote: » Maybe, or maybe some people are just d!cks. The car just gives them a heightened sense of their own importance and security, certainly the whole motor industry is predicated on macho. But it is also likely that these same people would be d!cks in any other part of their life. Probably 1st to complain but last to actually do anything, 1st to jump a queue, have some issues with the problems they are having all being someone other than their fault.
I'm not against pulling them up on their behaviour, certainly have (and continue) to do it. But I am always amazed by the reaction I get. Few very times (although their have been times) has the person held their hands up and said sorry. Not even sorry for the manouver, but sorry but causing the danger to me.
ror_74 wrote: » Maybe experiences vary depending on what part of the country you're in, but on the whole I find motorists OK ( the odd man in white van and taxi driver excepted ). Its other cyclists that get on my nerves. In Dublin city center at least.
Leroy42 wrote: » Report him for what? He was under the speed limit, changed lanes when it was safe to do so and helmets are not required by law. Certainly he is an idiot and I would be nervous cycling that road myself, never mid putting a kid on the top tube, but unfortunately there is no law (that I am aware of) for being stupid and reckless with your children.
(1) A person shall not drive a vehicle in a public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the place. (2) A person who contravenes subsection (1) of this section shall be guilty of an offence.
Certainly he is an idiot and I would be nervous cycling that road myself, never mid putting a kid on the top tube, but unfortunately there is no law (that I am aware of) for being stupid and reckless with your children.