OldNotWIse wrote: » Nobody is saying it's right, but it also doesn't make the "boy racers'" actions right either.
twin_beacon wrote: » the person did it out of spite, thats not right, as you are slowing down other cars stuck behind the "boy racer"
chopperbyrne wrote: » One, which I was the cause of on the N7 about two and a half years ago. Coming up to Newlands Cross everything was green lights ahead and I changed from the middle lane to the left lane behind a lorry because I wanted to take the M50 North after the junction. Lights went orange when I went behind the lorry and I didn't brake in time. Thankfully I only had some scratches and internal bruising and nobody else was injured. My car was about a foot shorter though.
Graces7 wrote: » Not spite! rolflol Maybe if YOU did it it would be spite! Please don't tar me with your brush, It was actually great fun! I chatted to the boy all the while...now then lad just be patient and stop that roaring and ranting! You are not going anywhere until it is safe and I say so..hold your wisht!
Maximus Alexander wrote: » This reminds me of one night when I was driving through Newland's Cross from Tallaght towards Clondalkin. It was late and I must have been pretty tired without realising it, because as I reached the middle of the intersection I heard a thundering horn and an articulated lorry whipped past me only inches from the front of the bonnet. Turns out I had mistaken the green pedestrian light for mine and had run a red. I was pretty well shaken up after that.
twin_beacon wrote: » ok mr/miss troll
twin_beacon wrote: » my point was, would you not feel stupid for provoking them? agreed, and likewise you can't go around provoking people either, and then complain when it comes back to bite you in the ass. as for "self-control", do you not feel the driver that slowed down showed poor levels of self-control? That action may effect many other road users, not just the car they are keeping behind them. IMO the person that slows down, shows as little self control as the person that does a stupid overtaking maneuver. Like the idiot in a night club, trying to start a fight
Graces7 wrote: » Goodnight all.. sleep well and drive carefully and be patient with little old ladies so that you will one day be old too.......;)
Littlekittylou wrote: » I have never been in a car crash. I have strangely a fear of driving?? And certain cars. Or fast drivers. I would like a go on a motorbike but I'm afraid. Yeah this was worth posting.
Tail Docker wrote: » This driving malarky sounds dangerous.
jimgoose wrote: » Do you drive at the moment, Kitty?
Littlekittylou wrote: » I have a learners and have had a few lessons. But no I would not consider myself a driver. I am very nervous about the whole thing. People think it's very weird. But I wouldn't drive unless I was secure that I was a confident and competent driver.
jimgoose wrote: » It'll come. Remember the literal translation of "Kung-Fu".
OldNotWIse wrote: » I disagree, though you are entitled to your opinion. The law will more than likely favour the one who was the victim of reckless driving or assault under section 3, rather than the driver who was provoked or the puncher who had mean things said to him. Re "feeling stupid for having provoked someone" - I don't think my feelings about a hypothetical situation are at all relevamt in the context of a discussion about the rights and wrongs of reckless driving, assault and where the line is on provocatioin.
twin_beacon wrote: » you are right, the law will always rule in favour of the victim. But that isn't my point. What good is having the law on your side, if you are seriously injured, paralyzed or killed in a crash? Lets say, like in the situation I originally quoted, a boy racer speeds up behind me, very eager to overtake. I slow down in spite of them, as a result they obviously get frustrated and even eager to overtake, and try to overtake when they shouldn't, causing a crash. In the eyes of the law, the person overtaking is 100% in the wrong, me slowing down in front added to their frustration. There are LOTS of idiots on the road, and you don't have to just worry about your own driving. Why make a dangerous situation even worse? How will slowing down, actually improve the situation?
ShowMeTheCash wrote: » But slowing down can only reduce the chances of an accident happening, you may argue that it increases the chances of the boy racer to over take or get angry...But in reality most accidents happen when people are travelling at speed... It is not to say an accident can't happen it simply makes it less likely.
ShowMeTheCash wrote: » Well not that I agree with anything that OldNotWise says as he comes across as a liability on the road and somewhat sick to take some kind of satisfaction or pleasure in people he deems to "deserve it" getting killed or injured on the roads. But slowing down can only reduce the chances of an accident happening, you may argue that it increases the chances of the boy racer to over take or get angry...But in reality most accidents happen when people are travelling at speed... It is not to say an accident can't happen it simply makes it less likely.