catweazle wrote: » Heart rate AKW you and my mother in law will be pleased to hear it was back to normal averaging out at 147 20k @ 5:00 pace.
AKW wrote: » Haha have you the place bugged or something?! All good and I was teeing you up for going long next year (2016) too, "sure it could be worse he could be off Adventure racing or something" Relativity.
catweazle wrote: » Not a good week overall - better call it a recovery week Friday: Nothing - Couldn't be helped as I had both kids for the day, I could gave gone out early evening I suppose but the young lad was in his skeleton suit at that stage so I decided it would be more fun to hang around for the trick or treaters. Saturday: 16k run at 5.02 pace. Nothing too much wrong with this but with a big 40th birthday piss up that night I should have gone off on the bike instead as I would have some chance of a run on sunday. Nice run - it was torrential rain which I have always liked when running so it was a good run.Sunday: Nothing: After swearing blind to the wife we would be home by 1am, I ended up pleading outside with the Salthill Hotel bouncers for a few late ones at 2am. It worked and got home after 4am. Alas the young ones had no sympathy for me and they were up at 6.30 looking for action. Got home just after 3 and had a window for a cycle at 4pm but it only took one big shower for me to write it off straight away for a read of the paper insteadMonday: The natural follow on from the booze up was to arrive at the pool with no togs or gear. So a nice shower and then off to Mayo as I have to be in the office all day No more booze ups till xmas at least now
pgibbo wrote: » Did you bring the young lad out trick or treating? Finn had savage craic going around.
tunney wrote: » either a great start to the day or a terrible one
pgibbo wrote: » When does the base training for Nice start? I'm not talking about the 16 week lead in but the base work in anticipation of that.
AKW wrote: » 15k run manana so?
catweazle wrote: » Do you even read your own log? Swapping bike and run this weekend, father in laws anniversary mass on Sunday so I would expect I won't have much time that day. Far better chance of a two hour run then a three hour bike. Count me in for the following Saturday though
pgibbo wrote: » It seems very strange to me that your suffering HR is 125 and your easy enough HR is 118. What's the story there?
catweazle wrote: » the next .5k was at 1.59 pace
BTH wrote: » Move over John Greaney.
catweazle wrote: » For an accountant I am surprised at your lack of attention to detail. Take a look at that again and you will see a decimal point before the 5, so that reads 1/2k at 1.59 which is far from outrageous :cool: