costadeldole wrote: » I am a 37 year old man, never married, no kids. Am I happy? Yes. I don't feel the need, or desire to every marry or have kids. I can understand why people want to marry and have kids, but I value my freedom to do what I like with no responsibilities more. Selfish? Yes.
NotASheeple wrote: » Yes. My older brother is a bachelor and very happy with it. He learned a painful lesson many years ago when his woman betrayed him. Thankfully he wasn't married and they had no kids. Today he hasn't a care in the world and is totally minted.
Grayson wrote: » I'm in my late 30's and if I met someone and settled down, that'd be nice. If it never happened, I'd be ok with it too. I would like to be a dad, but unfortunately you kinda need a woman to do that.
mariaalice wrote: » For all the...they are having a marvellous time and its all great, I would say Grayson post is the reality for most people. Have you really been on boards 15 years wow.
bur wrote: » Bit passive aggressive. The same goes for relationships and marriages. Brother is married to a woman who has gone a bit nuts the last few years, she's a nightmare but he stays for the kids. One uncle in a similar boat and another going through a messy divorce.
Birneybau wrote: » You do realise that 'confirmed bachelor' is a euphemism for an older gay man that never came out?
blackbird98 wrote: » aren't all single men batchelors???
Potatoeman wrote: » Nah, people that say stuff like that are usually gossips that are unhappy in their own lives and feel the need to knock other people behind their backs.
Polite euphemism for a gay man (from Victorian times, on the premise that such a man will never marry.)
Fuhrer wrote: » Some are widows
Joe prim wrote: » I reckon batchelors are still human beans.
Holsten wrote: » Never had any form of intimate relationship and be happy? I doubt that very much. Knowing men who have been trough the mill with ex wives and divorces etc. They can have very happy lives with a dog and casual partners.
Birneybau wrote: » Well, I heard it said of Joe Dolan, Cliff Richard...http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=confirmed+bachelor
Cosmicfox wrote: » I have an aunt in her fifties whose never married or had kids. She's very happy and has a very good career, always has plenty of money to spend on herself and to hand out to nephews and nieces. She did put up with some stick from her parents, especially since she's Spanish from a very catholic family but eventually they gave up pestering her and they got on better in the end. Some people just prefer their own company.
Holsten wrote: » Never had any form of intimate relationship and be happy? I doubt that very much.
Laura Palmer wrote: » I'm not sure if I'm convinced someone would be happy to live their entire life without ever having a partner of significance (for want of a better word) - but then again, that's just me thinking people think the same way I do. I do think it's definitely possible to be happy single for long periods though, and right up to well into one's 30s/40s. We assumed the bachelor life was the one for my uncle (and he seemed content too) and then he met herself in his late 40s, married and had kids. I don't agree that the above is selfish. Selfish to whom?
DoYouEvenLift wrote: » You should still think about having some sperm frozen as a 'just in case' for the future and then get a vasectomy - happy days. Also, what'd be your cutoff age for the youngest and oldest you'd hookup with?
Laura Palmer wrote: » Agreed. Selfishness affects other people. If you don't have a spouse/kids, then there aren't other people in the equation!