DM_7 wrote: » To make a big deal of the Network I want the Rock to turn up as part of team Cena at Survivor Series. Could lead to Rock v Triple H at Mania (as teased on Smackdown 15 anniversary)
Machismo Fan wrote: » Never Before, Never Again!!!
DM_7 wrote: » To make a big deal of the Network I want the Rock to turn up as part of team Cena at Survivor Series.
Ageyev wrote: » When do people think Survivor Series stopped being a major show where something significant happened and became "just a show" as they say? 2011 was a big deal because of The Rock but that was a once off. Every other Survivor Series in the past decade have been quite forgettable.
Necrominus wrote: » Just watching Armageddon 99 at the moment. How in all that is holy did Big Boss Man get anywhere near a WWE title match. Big Show's kip up was pretty damn cool though.
Moneymaker wrote: » 2002 was the last really good one imo. That was an awesome show. Solid card top to bottom.
duuuaaaane wrote: » 1998 was one of the best - the last on-the-night WWF Title tournament. 1999 then a return to the traditional 4-on-4 matches was exciting too. 2000 was the most forgettable show of it's time. Then 2001 - with the ending to the Invasion angle was (regardless of how much better the angle could of been) a fantastic exciting show. The following year with the build up to Brock's first lost and the inaugural Elimination Chamber match was great. 2003 - That was a fantastic show - but it was "just another Survivor Series" if that makes sense. The show wasn't billed as an anything special it just turned out that way. Since then I can't remember what any of them have been.
Agent Coulson wrote: » I am so offended I really am not to mention how they are using Sheamus's pale skin to mock us again totally disgusting an an insult to all pale skined Irish people. :pac:
mrkiscool2 wrote: » It's a CreepyPasta (a story people make up to scare others). And it's a very poor one at that.
rovert wrote: » 17 years since the Montreal Screwjob Got to admire them for keeping up the pretence it wasn't a work this long. :P
leggo wrote: » Yeah, I really don't get JR's whole 'character babyface' obsession with him. I don't see it at all. He does stuff that gets face reactions but that's simply because it's so catchy and different to anything anyone else is doing, the audience are reacting for the freshness rather than because they genuinely like the character and want to cheer him. If he was to start seeking cheers then it'd ruin everything cool about him. At best he could make an ironic face, just a heel that they're okay with fans cheering and book as such, but I don't think WWE are clever and subtle enough to pull that off these days. Too many people throwing out too many ideas that the diluted end product lacks the nuance required. Maybe down the line, when he's been around years, you could have him do his shtick and then have him wrestle like a Samoa Joe/Kevin Steen-like killer as a babyface. But you're cheering him then for the same reason people cheer Undertaker these days...and he's WAAAAAYY away from being in Taker's league.
Deadlie wrote: » Just heard that an Irish woman received an award from Putin last week for her work in Chernobyl. Its an annual thing, allegedly. She had dinner with him and received some award. No word of any Sports Personalities or Bulgarians on that list.
Stereomaniac wrote: » Aren't they putting Lana in a very difficult position if/when Rusev is gone, she is suddenly......Russian.
Stereomaniac wrote: » What would DX have to do with telling everyone that Lana was American, I missed the Kofi bit?