IP freely wrote: » I believe this is as close as someone has come to hitting me without hitting me if you know what I mean! I don't know what the guy was thinking? Apologies for the jumping at the start only happens when I use windows movie maker for some reason.
irishmover wrote: » Two more today. Second one: What am I missing in the 2nd one? He pulls in front early in the vid, is that it?
Matt_Trakker wrote: » irishmover wrote: » Two more today. Second one: What am I missing in the 2nd one? He pulls in front early in the vid, is that it? He cuts across a centre median, which came pretty close to the concrete line along it. Then cuts over a continuous white line. Also hits about 80km in a 60 zone then jams on as there's a speed camera.
irishmover wrote: » He cuts across a centre median, which came pretty close to the concrete line along it. Then cuts over a continuous white line. Also hits about 80km in a 60 zone then jams on as there's a speed camera.
irishmover wrote: » Matt_Trakker wrote: » He cuts across a centre median, which came pretty close to the concrete line along it. Then cuts over a continuous white line. Also hits about 80km in a 60 zone then jams on as there's a speed camera. Looks like the chap didn't know where he was and was in the wrong lane. Not like none of us have ever had to switch lanes quickly. Tbh, I cant make out the jamming on the brakes, but hard to see with the strong sunlight. 80k in a 60k zone, alright though yea, that's Michael Schumacher territory :pac::pac:
Matt_Trakker wrote: » He cuts across a centre median, which came pretty close to the concrete line along it. Then cuts over a continuous white line. Also hits about 80km in a 60 zone then jams on as there's a speed camera.
celticbest wrote: » M1 yesterday evening,
Pedro K wrote: » Ya should tweet the Garda Twitter page with that video and see if they have any comment!
Deleted User wrote: » How do you know that it was an unmarked Garda car?
celticbest wrote: » Will do that later
hairybelly wrote: » garda car video is nitpicking tbh
Sobanek wrote: » @irishmover: about the 2nd video - how is that dangerous driving? Did you see him pose any danger at any given situation? tbh, I know of plenty people who drive much more aggresively than this and they never had problems with the cops.
punisher5112 wrote: » The cops could be on a job, following someone, checking on something many many things I wouldn't be worried about them using hard shoulder as it is for break downs or emergency vehicles. Plenty that use it dangerously and skipping queues also. If they were driving reckless then report but not for what you have on video.
corktina wrote: » cancelled emergency call? How can you know they were Gards anyway?
celticbest wrote: » The same rules of the road apply to them unless they are on a call & they certainly were not, a
CramCycle wrote: » Actually the law states "in pursuit of their duties", or similar, I think its the reason they give for cycling on the pavement. Its more a pedant thing but if they are on duty, how can you prove that they weren't working basically.
Tragedy wrote: » It's from Reddit. Iirc state police arrested two men who were involved in a spate of robberies. Driver was in a lowered subaru which is why he didn't just go over the cones.
CramCycle wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClPZINVp0y8 What the hell? Seen it on google
bear1 wrote: » I've heard that in Croatia it is quite popular for that sort of roadblock to happen.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/d96cd5eb793ec44f833dd8d0bb2a52ac.svg)
