I love fields wrote: » Hi all, Family farm for sale (105 acres), no farmers in family. Half of it is great land, other half hilly but still decent. It's been leased out to a local farmer for a good few years but people now want to sell. What is the best option for a sale, auction or private treaty? What are the pro and cons? Preference is to sell all at once rather than lots. Grateful for any opinions or advice. Thanks
naughto wrote: » Would the man that's renting it not get 1st refusal to buy it?
royalmeath wrote: » That is the madest statement on here in a while. If you desire to sell go to an auctioneer and discuss the matter. Some auctioneers are mad to go straight to auction while others prefer to go private treaty first and then. when there are several parties involved private treaty is probably the best route as otherwise there could be a row on the day of the auction. When you sell an asset you should feel no obligation to any tenants no matter how long the have been in situ, afterall relative to the value of the property the have been paying a pittance for the use of the land. Best of luck to all involved hopefully you will get on well
Deepsouthwest wrote: » That's a fairly sweeping statement, some people on here paying around €300/acre, and some even more. Pittance it ain't
royalmeath wrote: » I think you should go back and read my post, I never said it was a pittance. But even paying 300 quid an acre you would have to rent the land for 30 years to actually pay close to its market value. Therefore it is a pittance relative to the value of the land
naughto wrote: » Who pissed in your cornflakes, Jesus I was only asking a question . Around her if a man is renting for x number of yrs then its put up for sake the man renting it usually has 1st dipps on it If he has no interest fair enough. You must have got burned buying land to come out with such a harsh statement on people who rent land to and to say they pay pittance for the use ofcland .
Deepsouthwest wrote: » Just re-read ur post, and u did say "pittance for the use of ur land"! I think ur mixing up renting land and trying to make a profit from that, and owning land and the asset value that goes with it, but that's an entirely different scenario. U may think €300/acre is to be sniffed at, but if I was offered that kind of money tax free, I'd grab it. Market value dictates the rental price in most places. What would u consider to be a fair price to rent an acre?
frazzledhome wrote: » Ye're all missing the point and a very important one at that. Banks are notoriously slow to sanction loads ATM. A parcel that size will require a loan. When deal done the closing process has slowed considerably. If it was mine I'd approach the tenant and let them know your intentions. I'd leave it up to them to register an interest. If they're interested with a good auctioneer will walk them into the market value. Failing this I'd go private treaty purely to allow people to get their ducks in a row. If you have 2-3 interested you may then decide to go to public auction and let the best horse jump the ditch. A health warning is that you need the title in 100% order and employ an experienced auctioneer and solicitor who are used to such dealings. Remember that if a public auction goes wrong and they sometimes do it is very hard to restart the process. People tend to stand back. With a public auction the buyer must have the deposit in the day and if people don't have enough notice this may not be in place. It is vital to determine your tax position before you commit to any route I wish you luck.
letterkenny man wrote: » What is the deposit 10% or 20% if I was to buy let's say 20 arces what taxes do I have to pay on it
Muckit wrote: » Don't really understand a booking deposit with private treaty as it counts for nothing as far as I can see. Neither party are committed to the sale legally until the contracts are signed. It leaves the seller open the buyer walking away and the buyer is vulnerable to possibly being gazumped. Which personally I feel is the lowest of the low acts, even though it's perfectly legal.
royalmeath wrote: » To be honest I had frosties and luckily they were urine free. I just dont see why someone would feel obliged to give anyone first dibbs on anything, if you sell a property you can only sell it once and you have to maximise the return you get for it. Its Bull McCabe territory expecting fist refusal on anything and we all know how that turned out.
paddysdream wrote: » With a deposit though the seller can't really walk away as strictly speaking a deposit is usually non refundable. It can be used to ensure that the selling process doesn't drag out and in a falling market let the prospective purchaser wait for months,sit on the deal and then throw it up and buy something cheaper. Pretty certain re. the non refundable part of the deposit as my solicitor told me that its legally non refundable in most cases but the usual practice is to return it in cases where the sale does not go through
amacca wrote: » I agree with you…renting a plot should not give you any expectation that you have a right of first refusal You agreed to rent it to use it, there was nothing in the agreement that you have any more rights than others to buy it ffs! Thats not saying wouldn't see what a renter might be willing to pay, but they wouldn't be getting any special rights above anyone else….if he/she was genuine and willing to offer a be a fair price then maybe I might ask them but it would still be available to higher bids etc
Farrell wrote: » That can lead to a situation where greed can spoil. Heard of guy renting ground, owner wanted to sell & advised tenant, who asked for 1 month to see if he could raise funds. He went to banks & got agreement for a loan & then gave owner the bid to which owner was happy but had to consult others. Long story short sale went public where tenant pulled out, sale price was supposed to be allot less than tenant offer
Farmer Pudsey wrote: » It is very hard if not impossible to retain a deposit on a private treaty sale. Have never heard of one being retained.
paddysdream wrote: » Not common practice and frowned upon but strictly speaking if you have a buyer who goes through up to contract signing and then waits for an unreasonable lenght of time before pulling out would you not be entitled to hang on to it? Many deposits(unsure re. property sales) are advertised as non refundable. Have sold machinery and other things here and never looked for a deposit in most cases. Odd person will ring,come to look and agree price(maybe hay) and tell you they will be back in a week etc.Sometimes you never see them again and you after putting of 2 or 3 people in the meantime by assuming the produce is sold. Well entitled to look for and keep deposit in this case.Messers usually run a mile if deposit is mentioned.Esp. if they think they won't be getting it back. On the other hand sold (gave away!) hay this year(100 bales) and wouldn't take a deposit .It was all up front or pay on collection as was afraid he would draw it over the winter rather than empty the shed before November as I needed it empty now at this stage.
frazzledhome wrote: » Once contract is signed either party can get what's called a "28 day notice" forcing closure, rarely needed