Barely There wrote: » No, I'm saying that you aren't worth listening to.
cletus van damme wrote: » you seem to think this is the only way. how about they stop taxing and allow people to spend? This will lead to more tax take and probably more jobs meaning less welfare. noonan admitted he needed more money and just threw 2% onto the VAT to get the magic number. It's such a thick arsed way to go about things. Why not be brave and slash it to 15% ? We already see the benefit of VAT reduction in the hospitality sector. This government is taxing us to the hilt and we are seeing nothing in return. This tax is to pay for the banks and a bloated public sector - the irony is that we get little service for this - the only really competant department is the revenue....:rolleyes: as for the banks , we all know the craic with that and how the irish citizens carried that can . This is the breaking point and enough is enough I'm against water charges for moral reasons but i'm also pragmatic . If I saw service I'd happily pay for it. But this is not about water it's about more tax for the government. But how do we know any water charges will pay for the upkeep of the water system? we were told the LPT was to be spent on local services and how did that pan out? yeah.
Lucy and Harry wrote: » Paying 600 million to put water meters in could have gone to help fix leaks instead.We are already paying and have always done for our water in our tax.The cash IW want for their bonuses would be saved if we said F off to IW.We are giving them cash and we do not need to.There is no proof IW will not go private either and we will be paying more and more and being sponged off.Too many mistakes so far by FG and IW or the people to have trust. There is no guarantee IW will fix the 40% leaks there is no magic wand and no evidence that IW will magically fix every issue we have regarding leaks.And Irish people do not have the cash to pay IW anyhow as we have suffered enough already.You cant get blood from a stone.
geeksauce wrote: » Saw it for a couple of minutes last night about 11, who was your one on it in the studio. The lady with the short red hair who was anti water charges, I thought she was completely useless, great at dodging questions yes but completely and utterly useless at answering any questions directed to her. The couple of minutes I saw of it she was asked 'the price of providing water per year is €1billion, you want to scrap water charges so how do you intend to fund the provision of the water services' Her answer was something along the lines of 'well at the last by-election the AAA did quite well' Seriously though how in the hell does anyone listen to the likes of her and think she talks sense, wants to abolish water charges yet cant explain how the provision of water services will be funded once the charges are abolished, ridiculous. The other chap on it then makes a point of saying that it is intended to invest €1billion per year for 10 years on repairing and upgrading the water system. She interrupts him and says 'sure you spent €500 million on installing water meters, so why didn't you use that money to fix the broken infrastructure'............. Why you fcuking idiot? Well because it is going to cost €10billion to fix it so using that money still leaves it short by about €9.5billion, but of course there is no point asking you how this will be funded as you will no doubt start talking about some recent by-election.
cletus van damme wrote: » But how do we know any water charges will pay for the upkeep of the water system?
seamus wrote: » Where else would they go? The government is not collecting the water charges.
You're selective vision is infuriating
Barely There wrote: » Apparently if you shout 'Enough is Enough' really, really loudly, it substantially reduces our budget deficit, increases capital spending on infrastructure and reduces taxes and charges on workers. Not really sure why we haven't been trying this policy before now. Stupid politicians again I suppose.
Lucy and Harry wrote: » they can go on big salaries bonuses and corrupt owners. Please don't be infuriated or upset it is bad for you sir.Ad Hominem attacks are no use either and not helpful for honest debate.ARE YOU seriously denying the Irish tax payer has already paid for the set up of Irish Water.We have already paid out of the budget.Water meter installation costs wonga.They do not unlike water fall from the Sky
Tarzana2 wrote: » Errr, has anyone else not yet received their pack in the post yet? We have tried, but nothing yet!
papu wrote: » So where would the other 94% needed to fix the water supply come from? if the 600million were spent fixing leaks?
Lucy and Harry wrote: » we cant afford to fix the leaks.That is the thing.600 million would be better off doing something though would it not.Instead of going to IW.They will not fix everything with a magic wand.They will not do it for free.We do not have the cash to fix all those leaks we are in poverty.Do you not get that?Do you not listen to people?They say they cant pay?They have too many bills coming through the door.Some people are losing their homes.People are committing suicide.RATES OF SUICIDE HAVE GONE UP do you not care?Is it a case of the typical Irish way of I am all right Jack fuuuu You have been told people have no blood to be sucked any more and yet still you demand we pay to fix leaks we cant afford to..IW have already made so many mistakes do you think they have the competence to fix water leaks.Really.Just because they come in and promise heaven you believe their lies.They are being set up to become a private company and then when things go up again and again for profit maybe someday you will see they lied and conned us.Our asset of water is being sold and no good will come of that.
Lucy and Harry wrote: » http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/irish-water-asks-council-to-supply-names-and-addresses-of-council-tenants-649727.html oh no Irish Water are at it again.So much for the apology.Irish Water asks council to supply names and addresses of council tenants so much for Data protection.
Irish Water asks council to supply names and addresses of council tenants 15913 04/11/2014 - 12:10:57Back to Ireland Home People Before Profit is calling on local authorities to reject attempts by Irish Water to secure the names and addresses of council tenants. It comes after Wicklow County Council revealed that it has been asked to supply the information about Rental Accommodation Scheme tenants to the utility company. The representative for People Before Profit in Greystones, Jacqui Johnston, says the latest attempt by Irish Water to secure personal details of local authority tenants will be seen as further evidence of the "desperate bullying attempts" to impose water charges.
Can't be done as far as im aware.
sign_out wrote: » i dont envy goverment people cry about cutting waste but are also upset if relative of theirs are let go in areas of the public sector which are over staffed etc
sign_out wrote: » while irish water appear to have been very good at lining up at the trough for bonuses etc why on earth would people believe the local authorities ( the endless number of them ) would be particulary prudent with tax payers money when it comes to delivering water , they have zero form when it comes to fiscal prudence
riclad wrote: » how long till this company gets hacked.? Its the only public body, apart from social welfare, revenue, that has everyone,s name and adress and prsi no. This info would be very valuable to hackers ,for id theft and financial fraud . I see no reason that a single person working. living alone has to give out a prsi no,given it has no effect on your water charge , I wonder are they using the latest encryption ,password hashing methods to protect customer,s data.
riclad wrote: » how long till this company gets hacked.? Its the only public body, apart from social welfare, revenue, that has everyone,s name and adress and prsi no. This info would be very valuable to hackers ,for id theft and financial fraud . I see no reason that a single person working. living alone has to give out a prsi no,given it has no effect on your water charge , I wonder are they using the latest encryption ,password hashing methods to protect customer,s data. What they do in the public sector ,councils etc is they stop replacing staff when people retire, hence we get a lower level of service .
No problems giving PPS numbers to doctors , dentists , the HSE , employers , Universities. These all have databases too. Why wouldn't someone just hack the central government PPS database?
sign_out wrote: » a very sizeable percentage of the electorate have the maturity of three year olds surrounding a teacher handing out sweets at the school xmas party
WakeUp wrote: » It should be so easy. How much political brilliance does it take to persuade the population that it is necessary to change a water supply system that leaves whole cities (Galway) and almost entire counties (Roscommon) without drinkable water for long periods? That wastes through leakage half of all the expensively treated water it produces? That the State can’t do this tells us something about much more than the debacle of Irish Water. It tells us about the governability of the State itself. It would be hysterical to suggest that the State is ungovernable. But it would be naive to deny that it is heading gradually in that direction. And heading there for good reasons: a very significant part of the population has ceased to feel that the State is theirs, that it tries its best to treat them with care and dignity. The public revolt against water charges is not, for the most part, a rebellion against the eminently sensible idea that a small State should have a single public utility to develop its water system. It’s an expression of anger about bigger things: command-and-control politics; trust-me- I’m-an-expert arrogance; rotten, feckless disregard for the realities of life at the bottom of the heap; the feeling that nobody gives a curse how you live or what you think.http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/the-irish-water-debacle-why-the-state-is-heading-towards-being-ungovernable-1.1986550
Lucy and Harry wrote: » This company was never set up to improve Irelands water system, it was set up with the sole purpose of lining the pockets of DO'B and all the usual suspects. Jack O'Connor admitted yesterday that IW will be sold quickly as soon as it's up and running but that nobody in government had the guts to admit this. IW are doing it behind peoples back.Do you not see a difference.