nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

ALL THINGS IRISH WATER/WATER CHARGE RELATED POST HERE

Crann na Beatha

This post has been deleted.

Find more posts tagged with

water

fanny

irish water

water charges

con job

wrecked

water consumption

brainwashed

new world order in action

nazi aliens!

make them pay joe!

imf agenda

u & whose army?

end of 31st dáil

denis o’brien

Comments

listermint

papu wrote: »

no , they already have provisions in place to be able to draw money from the government if they run a loss , IW will be funded one way or another.

Not if the bloated hulk of middlemanagement mess ceases to exist.

papu

listermint wrote: »

Not if the bloated hulk of middlemanagement mess ceases to exist.

This is getting a bit tedious..

papu wrote: »

Speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, Mr Coveney said: "There's one certainty, and that's that Irish Water won't be scrapped."Source

Stargate

Little CuChulainn wrote: »

Pretty pathetic grounds to demand a resignation for.

Pretty pathetic comments by the lady in question would you not agree ?
I expect you will retort with your usual BS !

Thanks in advance .

Little CuChulainn

Stargate wrote: »

Pretty pathetic comments by the lady in question would you not agree ?
I expect you will retort with your usual BS !

Thanks in advance .

I don't agree.

gladrags

VinLieger wrote: »

No actually im quite mystified, going back through this thread as it's been posted here before im sure, but i can assure you the regulator needs to be consulted on any price change.

Nothing new there.

The regulator consistently increases prices for companies,after consultation.

There is no guarantee he will not do likewise for FG cronies.

Stargate

Little CuChulainn wrote: »

I don't agree.

Just shows how detached you are just as the present Government seem to be from the people right now , but the day is coming soon when that will end bigtime.

The moneypot is empty

Enough is really enough .

[Deleted User]

[QUOTE=Lucy and Harry;92883554
Shinners according to polls are in front if there was a election in the morning.
[/QUOTE]
Shinners were in front of Paul Murphy until the final count, might have been 6 counts?

FionnK86

Stargate wrote: »

Just shows how detached you are just as the present Government seem to be from the people right now , but the day is coming soon when that will end bigtime.

The moneypot is empty

Enough is really enough .

I think you're a bit delusional, things will never change. Instead of complaining on boards why not start a campaign with meetings to stop it.

Banjo String

Fred Swanson wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Yeah cos that'd much more technically feasible. :pac:

Some of you lads are on the wind up.

Stargate

FionnK86 wrote: »

I think you're a bit delusional, things will never change. Instead of complaining on boards why not start a campaign with meetings to stop it.

That old famous word " delusional " , well done ! 10 out of 10 .
That gave me a good ole laugh . Thanks :rolleyes:

Lucy and Harry

http://www.herald.ie/news/leo-checks-in-on-social-media-under-pseudonym-30712002.html so which one of you is Leo the Lion

Lucy and Harry

Deleted User wrote: »

Shinners were in front of Paul Murphy until the final count, might have been 6 counts?

The arrogance of FG and Labour will see the end of them just like the arrogance of FF saw them beaten.

FionnK86

Stargate wrote: »

That old famous word " delusional " , well done ! 10 out of 10 .
That gave me a good ole laugh . Thanks :rolleyes:

No bother lad

VinLieger

Lucy and Harry wrote: »

http://www.herald.ie/news/leo-checks-in-on-social-media-under-pseudonym-30712002.html so which one of you is Leo the Lion

Not sure what it has to do with the topic and tbh i don't begrudge him a way to be on social media to stay in touch with his friends without being under scrutiny all the time.

Grandpa Hassan

Lucy and Harry wrote: »

http://www.herald.ie/news/leo-checks-in-on-social-media-under-pseudonym-30712002.html so which one of you is Leo the Lion

What's the issue with this? Seems perfectly sensible, and exactly what I would expect public figures to do. No relevance to the discussion at hand anyway

donvito99

Lucy and Harry wrote: »

The arrogance of FG and Labour will see the end of them just like the arrogance of FF saw them beaten.

And yet FF are set to make up the next government...

Lucy and Harry

Not if things keep going the way they are.

No relevance to the discussion at hand anyway

Yes it does as some people here have been accused of being FG or IW agents with a agenda.The way some people think the sun shines out of FG behinds and see nothing negative about IW and call the protesters a ''mob''.People defending a FG woman saying people can drink rain water for a week.And people wanting water to be cut for people who cant afford to pay.Very suspicious.

VinLieger

Lucy and Harry wrote: »

Not if things keep going the way they are.

Yes it does as some people here have been accused of being FG or IW agents with a agenda.The way some people think the sun shines out of FG behinds and see nothing negative about IW and call the protesters a ''mob''.

How is him having a private social media account negative? He may be an elected official but he is also entitled to some small semblance of a private life as well

Grandpa Hassan

Lucy and Harry wrote: »

Not if things keep going the way they are.

Yes it does as some people here have been accused of being FG or IW agents with a agenda.The way some people think the sun shines out of FG behinds and see nothing negative about IW and call the protesters a ''mob''.

What?

Lucy and Harry

VinLieger wrote: »

How is him having a private social media account negative? He may be an elected official but he is also entitled to some small semblance of a private life as well

You are missing the point on purpose.The point is he could be one of you spouting FG propaganda.Irish water has been a disaster and you know it.Another double tax.

papu

Lucy and Harry wrote: »

Not if things keep going the way they are.

Yes it does as some people here have been accused of being FG or IW agents with a agenda.The way some people think the sun shines out of FG behinds and see nothing negative about IW and call the protesters a ''mob''.People defending a FG woman saying people can drink rain water for a week.And people wanting water to be cut for people who cant afford to pay.Very suspicious.

People who won't pay. There is a difference.

Lucy and Harry

What about the ones who cant pay.Can they and their kids drink rain water.

tayto lover

papu wrote: »

Speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, Mr Coveney said: "There's one certainty, and that's that Irish Water won't be scrapped."Source

Coveney could go himself if he doesn't mind his constituents

papu

Lucy and Harry wrote: »

What about the ones who cant pay.Can they and their kids drink rain water.

The poor should always be protected.
Those who can afford to pay should , I don't think anyone is arguing that those who can't actually afford be disconnect , jailed , put on a trickle pressure etc...

mynameismud

VinLieger wrote: »

No actually im quite mystified, going back through this thread as it's been posted here before im sure, but i can assure you the regulator needs to be consulted on any price change.

So tell us Vin,if there is 100% compliance next year on the metered/assessed charges how much will this raise?

How much will IW need each year?

Little CuChulainn

mynameismud wrote: »

So tell us Vin,if there is 100% compliance next year on the metered/assessed charges how much will this raise?

How much will IW need each year?

Impossible to say. You'd have to know what repairs would be made to the network, how much conservation would occur by users and what changes are to be made to the collection and purification process if any. And that's aside from any internal factors such as redundancies and bonuses and all the rest.

Lucy and Harry

www.neurope.eu/.../commission-... water privatisation for countries receiving bailout
www.greens-efa.eu/bail-out-cou... by water privateers
www.cppc.ie/water-metering-wat... privatization

Are you all happy with privatisation of our water.

and bonuses and all the rest.

Irish Water love their bonuses aye

VinLieger

Lucy and Harry wrote: »

You are missing the point on purpose.The point is he could be one of you spouting FG propaganda.Irish water has been a disaster and you know it.Another double tax.

And you could be paul murphy for all we know..... take off your tinfoil hat FFS

papu

Lucy and Harry wrote: »

www.neurope.eu/.../commission-... water privatisation for countries receiving bailout
www.greens-efa.eu/bail-out-cou... by water privateers
www.cppc.ie/water-metering-wat... privatization

Are you all happy with privatisation of our water.

Irish Water love their bonuses aye

When has it been Privatized?

VinLieger

mynameismud wrote: »

So tell us Vin,if there is 100% compliance next year on the metered/assessed charges how much will this raise?

How much will IW need each year?

How could I possibly know that? All I said was that the energy regulator has to approve any increase in price.